stupidest thing ever

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

Swampcat

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>http://rescommunis.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/noaa-open-letter-to-google-lunar-x-prize-participants/Did Bigelow get one I wonder?&nbsp; <br />Posted by spacy600</DIV></p><p>Not likely. As far as I know, Bigelow is not a member of one of the teams.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="3" color="#ff9900"><p><font size="1" color="#993300"><strong><em>------------------------------------------------------------------- </em></strong></font></p><p><font size="1" color="#993300"><strong><em>"I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. Unsuccessful rebellions, indeed, generally establish the encroachments on the rights of the people which have produced them. An observation of this truth should render honest republican governors so mild in their punishment of rebellions as not to discourage them too much. It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government."</em></strong></font></p><p><font size="1" color="#993300"><strong>Thomas Jefferson</strong></font></p></font> </div>
 
S

spacy600

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Not likely. As far as I know, Bigelow is not a member of one of the teams. <br /> Posted by Swampcat</DIV></p><p>Most likly yes</p><p>I just read this:</p><p>http://www.licensing.noaa.gov/eolicense.htm</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>National security and all.</p><p>I wasn't thinking of high powered resolution from the moon, just pretty pictures.</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
 
S

Swampcat

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Most likly yesI just read this:http://www.licensing.noaa.gov/eolicense.htmNational security and all.I wasn't thinking of high powered resolution from the moon, just pretty pictures.&nbsp; <br />Posted by spacy600</DIV><br /><br />Most likely not...quote: "NOAA Open Letter to Google Lunar X PRIZE&nbsp;Participants."</p><p>My understanding of English&nbsp;interprets&nbsp;this statement as meaning that the NOAA letter was sent to "Google Lunar X PRIZE Participants." Logically, that implies Bigelow did <strong><em>not</em></strong> get one since he is not a Google X Prize participant.</p><p>Of course, you are free to apply whatever rules of logic and language parsing you wish to the statement and conclude otherwise, but what is your point? <img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/content/scripts/tinymce/plugins/emotions/images/smiley-undecided.gif" border="0" alt="Undecided" title="Undecided" /></p><p>Now, have Bigelow and NOAA communicated about this issue? Probably, though it would have nothing to do with the Google X Prize.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="3" color="#ff9900"><p><font size="1" color="#993300"><strong><em>------------------------------------------------------------------- </em></strong></font></p><p><font size="1" color="#993300"><strong><em>"I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical. Unsuccessful rebellions, indeed, generally establish the encroachments on the rights of the people which have produced them. An observation of this truth should render honest republican governors so mild in their punishment of rebellions as not to discourage them too much. It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government."</em></strong></font></p><p><font size="1" color="#993300"><strong>Thomas Jefferson</strong></font></p></font> </div>
 
S

spacy600

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Most likely not...quote: "NOAA Open Letter to Google Lunar X PRIZE&nbsp;Participants."My understanding of English&nbsp;interprets&nbsp;this statement as meaning that the NOAA letter was sent to "Google Lunar X PRIZE Participants." Logically, that implies Bigelow did not get one since he is not a Google X Prize participant.Of course, you are free to apply whatever rules of logic and language parsing you wish to the statement and conclude otherwise, but what is your point? Now, have Bigelow and NOAA communicated about this issue? Probably, though it would have nothing to do with the Google X Prize. <br /> Posted by Swampcat</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>My point is the law of unintended consequence</p><p>variation on a theme&nbsp;</p><p>So a passenger on virgin galactic's SS2 will or wont be allowed a imaging device ?</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.