The birth of the Quantum Convergence Threshold (QCT):

[Geoff Dann]

Really?

List of potentially habitable exoplanets - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

List of Kepler exoplanet candidates in the habitable zone - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Listing "potential habitats" is not actually getting us any closer to finding alien life. We've been clutching at straws like this for a very long time now.

 

[Geoff Dann]

And if Musk flies to Mars, then the Earth will no longer be the only planet with the conscious beings. Do you agree?

That is irrelevant though. It will still be the same instance of conscious life. The theory doesn't say humans can't travel to Mars. It says there isn't any life there before we get there.

 

[marcin]

So theoretically humanity could spread across the whole galaxy, inhabit multiple planets, and your theory would still be in agreement with it, yes? Conscious observers would be separated by a tens of light years.

If all these potentially habitable planets are lifeless, then I still wonder why I don't and you have a problem imagining a planet full of life in other galaxy within our observable universe, but also and especially beyond it.

The funnienst thing for me in our conversation and in this theory is that retrocausality based on our consciousness shaping the past could make aliens pop-up out of non-existence and align them with everything that we know so far. Do you agree with it?

Sorry for mixing the forums, but it would be great if you also replied to this comment:

Physics Discussion Forum-New "two phase" cosmology and QM interpretation, solves 15+ foundational problems

What if one simple new suggestion resolves nearly all of the major outstanding problems/paradoxes in cosmology, and doesn't introduce any new ones? Si

physicsdiscussionforum.org

 

[Geoff Dann]

So theoretically humanity could spread across the whole galaxy, inhabit multiple planets, and your theory would still be in agreement with it, yes? Conscious observers would be separated by a tens of light years.

Given enough time, yes. I am not saying there's a laws-of-physics reason why conscious organisms can't spread, only that it can only have evolved once, in one place.

If all these potentially habitable planets are lifeless, then I still wonder why I don't and you have a problem imagining a planet full of life in other galaxy within our observable universe, but also and especially beyond it.

The reason is that I understand my theory and you don't. It explains a whole bunch of stuff which isn't explainable any other way, and it has an implication that conscious life can only evolve once (and almost certainly the same applies to any form of life).

The funnienst thing for me in our conversation and in this theory is that retrocausality based on our consciousness shaping the past could make aliens pop-up out of non-existence and align them with everything that we know so far. Do you agree with it?

No, that doesn't work. Our consciousness can't shape the past in that way -- it can only do so with respect to our own consciousness -- it can't cause consciousness to arise somewhere else. That doesn't fit the theory.

Sorry for mixing the forums, but it would be great if you also replied to this comment:

Physics Discussion Forum-New "two phase" cosmology and QM interpretation, solves 15+ foundational problems

What if one simple new suggestion resolves nearly all of the major outstanding problems/paradoxes in cosmology, and doesn't introduce any new ones? Si

physicsdiscussionforum.org

I hadn't seen that. That is you is it?