The relic radiation

[Ignat]

The relic radiation is a consequence of the inflationary hypothesis, and the hypothesis itself, mistakenly called the theory, does not depend on whether there was a big bang or not. Therefore, it is at least incorrect to say that the microwave background confirms the big bang theory.According to the inflationary hypothesis, the hot universe was a plasma, and huge energy is needed to keep the plasma in a stable state, where did it come from?

 

[Classical Motion]

The only thing we know for sure is that the CMBR is omni-directional.

As is our solar system. As is our galaxy.

The solar winds form a particle density around our solar system and around our galaxy.

These are very rarefied fluxes. If the wind particles are recombining and emitting, it would be a very rarefied omni directional flux, much different than normal starlight flux.

The particles recombining to form dipoles, the H1 atom. Raw fuel for new dust and stars.

Part of the emissions might be H1 interactions too. Too rarefied for single detections. Too thin for observable and detectable for light.

And no one has ever studied omni directional spacial wave superposition. The APPARENT detection.

I’ll betting the CMBR is more local. And more present.

Would the CMBR be the same intensity on Pluto? Let’s put calibrated CMBR detectors on all future probes. Track it like a heartbeat. Integrate it with our probe radios.

 

[Helio]

Therefore, it is at least incorrect to say that the microwave background confirms the big bang theory.

Well, the CMBR doesn't prove the BBT because no theory, for one reason, can be proven. A scientific theory must not only allow itself to fail, it must make predictions that would falsify it. But, if the predictions are discovered to match the theory, then the theory gets stronger. The greater the level of the prediction, the more impact it has on the theory.

The CMBR was predicted following the work of Gamow and Alpher who together determined that the universe must be mostly made of mostly hydrogen nuclei, assuming a hot Big Bang.

Not long thereafter, Alpher and Hermann realized that the BBT's expansion would allow the nuclei to allow electron, thus forming the first atom. They realized that such an event would stop the huge photon scattering and a CMBR would be observable. It was a huge prediction, but it took great effort to find it.

Inflation "theory" was added to explain only the smoothness of the CMBR, as well as the "flatness" problem.

According to the inflationary hypothesis, the hot universe was a plasma, and huge energy is needed to keep the plasma in a stable state, where did it come from?

The Hot BBT, unlike Lemaitre's cold version, gave us plasma. Inflation "theory" was not a temperature adjusting idea.

But, as you ask, where did all that energy/matter come from? It is likely beyond the purview of science since science is objective-based, where we must be able to test ideas with direct or indirect observations.