What is Time?
First off we need to determine what time actually is. Is time being described here as a unified theory that has all ofthe aspects of the Twin Paradox included in the unified theory? Because time is actually a generalized and broad term used to describe the measurable distance between two particles that have affected upon each other a force of exerted energy where each type of particle will affect the other particle in such a way to created a distance between the other or time.
How came to this description of time was rather easy. I looked at historical time and what historical time is. History is the measureable progress of a civilization. With the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki creating a whole new time line from what people before this event had understood a new era for history had occured. If we watch the time line of the major events since then we can see that the energy of both biological and energetic systems being involved to create a length of measureable distance from the event in the past to today has created a measureable distance of length that can be measured. The same measure can be used when defining both energitic time lines as well as biological time lines. For energetic time lines the distance that the particle travels is based off of the initial event between two particles that caused an energetic reaction between the two particles that sent a particle one direction and the other particle in the opposite direction based off of the the two particles producing a certain amount of energy that then created an equal and opposite of length, time or distance between the two particles. The only affect that would create an aging process for the particles would be how much energy each particle was able to produce before exhausting all of the particles stored energy where the particle would diffuse into neutral and non energetic particles that may or may not be re-energized to become a new and possibly different type of particle based on the compression of the particle by a much more energetic force.
Biological time is the rate at which biological cells grow and decay based upon how much and of what type of energetic particle their cellular structures absorb. The more energy that a cell absorbs creates the possibilty of the cell becoming to energetic which would cause the reactions that the cell is part of to also increase in their energetic response. Not enough energy and the cells become sluggish were particles then build up on these particles that slow them down even farther. This process is called metabolism. If we take the twin paradox and apply the metabolism to the experiment, we can see that the farther away (or a measureable distance or time) from the sun which provides the bodies biological
process with energy, the less energy the body will take in and be able to use for cellular growth. This means that the body would not age as quickly because of the lesser amount of UV radiation present. Both observers would ahve two age histories one being a Solar Age or the amount of UV radiation absorbed that will decrease or increase cellular growth and decay as well as a Terran Age where the person would age depending on the yearly orbit of the Earth around the Sun. IF we could measure the affects of different biological cells at varrying distances from the Sun we would see this process very clearly, but since we do not have these types of facilities available to us then we can only conjecturize about the results. Lets say for instance on Earth the observer ages at a one year interval based upon the orbit of the Earth around the Sun, but in Solar years the person actually ages 5 times as fast. We have three observers, one is constantly kept inside until age 50, one is constantly in and out of the house on a 50/50 basis.The third observer is constantly outside for the entire 50 years never using any other shelter other then a sleeping bag to keep warm, of course outside bathing and hygiene facilities are allowed to be used, we dont want any stinky observers. All three observers will have aged the same Earth age of 50 years but each would have aged differently in Solar Years. The observer who was indoors their whole life would have developed a constant growth rate of their cells depending upon the amount of UV radiation that they absorbed in this case gamma radiation, which is the only radiation that is not able to be blocked and would have the most affect upon a biological cell. Observer one would be fifty Earth Years in age but would actually only be 20 Solar years in age based on the amount of gamma radiation that was absorbed. Observer two would be 50 Earth Years in age and 100 Solar Years in age due to the increased amount of gamma radiation absorbed that caused cellular decay and an increase in stress upon the body to replace the cells lost which causes further cells and energy to be used. The observer that was outside their whole life would be 50 Earth years in age but would be approximately 500 Solar Years in age due to the extreme amount of gamma radiation absorbed on a daily basis. Now if we take this model and place the three observer's in space observer three on the Earth, observer two near Pluto and observer one at the same distance that observer two is from observer three, we can generate the same results based on time ( or a measureable distance of a unit of length) that each observer will age the same Earth years based on the amount of days that the Earth takes to travel around the Sun as being the same, but when we factor in the amount of radiation obsorbed, each observer would age differently based upon their distance ( or time) from the Sun. Now if we take the three observers and place them in the different locations which one do you think will be able to better adapt to the new environment? The observer on Pluto would of course. The reason why is because observer two has obsorbed gamma radiation at a 50% extreme amount for their 50 years on Earth. This means that their bodies equilibrium would be balanced to produce cells in either environment of being sheltered or being fully exposed to the radiation given off by the Sun. Both observer's One and Three however would suffer extreme cellular damage due to the increase of gamma radiation to observer one that had been isolated his whole life which would shock his system and cause cancers to develop, observer three would develop cancers due to the decreased amount of gamma radiation obsorbed on a daily basis that would shock his system's cellular growth rate. Both observers One and Three would then
age normally based on the standard Earth age calculator but would increase their Solar Age by 25% due to the increased amount of stress being placed upon the body when dealing with the increase and decrease of gamma radiation absorption.
That is true about Mars, Since their is no atmosphere on Mars to block out the UV radiation from the Sun the Solar age of the observer on Mars would actually increase by 100 when compared to observer three on Earth. The Martian observer would age three ways now, the first age would be based upon the time it takes Mars to make one revolution around the Sun, The Martians Earth Age which is based on how long it takes the Earth to revolve around the Sun and the Martians Solar Age or the amount of UV Radiation that is obsorbed that causes cellular growth and decay rates to increase or decrease which puts an increase or decrease of stress on the orgins that produce cells to replace the cells that have been damaged and mutated by the Sun's UV radiation.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram