Theory of Autodynamics

[yree]

Theory Autodynamics <br />Ricardo Carezani<br />From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.<br /><br />Ricardo Libertario Carezani (b. April 11, 1921 in Cordoba, Argentina), is an Argentine physicist and the father of the theory Autodynamics (AD), a theory he discovered after finding a mistake in Lorentz and Einstein's work. His study of physics began as a 20-year-old in the early 1940s. From the outset he considered Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity to be ill-founded and set about his own critical analysis. By the age of 24 he had developed the foundations for what is now a substantial physical theory based on science fact and rigorous logic.<br /><br />Carezani received his PhD in physics in Argentina where he was born and published his theory in 1953 in the large newspaper in Buenos Aires. The paper was told not to publish anything else by Dr. Carezani for fear of being shut down. Carezani published a book on this theory but only had support from intellectuals and succeeded in printing only 300 books.<br /><br />Once Juan Domingo Perón died, Carezani moved to the United States and did an experiment in San Francisco. Although the experiment turned out to be flawed in design to prove his theory, he came up with another experiment and published a larger body of works in books and articles and on the internet.<br /><br />Some of his more notable works include deriving Bohr's Atom equations without the use of wave equations, a better Compton Effect equation (recognized and used by some physicists), and a comprehensive mechanism for the system of gravity that explains the perihelion advance for all bodies including binary stars, the apparent Pioneer slowdown, the Allias Anomaly, and Lunar Distancing.<br /><br />Dr. Carezani now lives and works in Long Beach, California. The portrait of Carezani was taken by world-famous photographer Herman Leonard.<br /><br />http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricardo_Carezani<br />

 

[kmarinas86]

Doesn't look good:<br />http://www.autodynamics.org/html/ad_in_pictures.html

 

[yree]

Doesn't look good:<br />http://www.autodynamics.org/html/ad_in_pictures.html<br /><br /> I do not Judge theory by web site. Judge<br /> by Published in Physics Journal.<br /><br />Published in Physics Essays<br />Volume 1 Number 4 December 1988<br />A New Experiment With RaE<br />p. 269<br />Volume 5 Number 1 March 1992<br />The Muon Decay &#956;+? e+ e+ e- and Autodynamics<br />p. 19<br />Volume 10 Number 2 June 1997<br />Nucleus-Nucleus Collision and Autodynamics<br />p. 193

 

[yree]

A review of conventional explanations of anomalous<br />observations during solar eclipses<br />Chris P. Duif<br />Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Radiation, Radionuclides & Reactors<br />Delft University of Technology,<br />Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB, Delft, The Netherlands<br />The Netherlands<br />eMail: c.p.duif@iri.tudelft.nl / chrisd@space-time.info<br />http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0408/0408023.pdf<br />An invisible hand?<br />Aug 19th 2004<br />From The Economist print edition<br /> <br />Printable page<br /><br />E-mail this<br />Gravitational anomalies<br /><br />An invisible hand?<br />Aug 19th 2004<br />From The Economist print edition<br /><br /><br /><br />An unexplained effect during solar eclipses casts doubt on General Relativity<br /><br />“ASSUME nothing” is a good motto in science. Even the humble pendulum may spring a surprise on you. In 1954 Maurice Allais, a French economist who would go on to win, in 1988, the Nobel prize in his subject, decided to observe and record the movements of a pendulum over a period of 30 days. Coincidentally, one of his observations took place during a solar eclipse. When the moon passed in front of the sun, the pendulum unexpectedly started moving a bit faster than it should have done.<br /><br />Since that first observation, the “Allais effect”, as it is now called, has confounded physicists. If the effect is real, it could indicate a hitherto unperceived flaw in General Relativity—the current explanation of how gravity works.<br /><br />RELATED ITEMS<br />More articles about...<br />Space<br /><br />Advertisment<br /><br />That would be a bombshell—and an ironic one, since it was observations taken during a solar eclipse (of the way that light is bent when it passes close to the sun) which established General Relativity in the first place. So attempts to duplicate Dr A

 

[le3119]

The neutrino doesn't really exist? Whaaaa.....? So when positrons and electrons collide, and release gamma ray photons, no neutrinos are released? And exploding stars don't release neutrinos either? What calculation error can explain the neutrino fallacy? Neutrinos are next to impossible to detect, but we do detect something. I'm having trouble with a slam against my very favorite particle in our beloved cosmos. How dare you?!

 

[yree]

Autodynamics<br />From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.<br /><br />Autodynamics is a replacement for special relativity and general relativity proposed by Ricardo Carezani in the early 1940s.<br /><br />The primary claim of Autodynamics is that the equations of the Lorentz transformation are incorrectly formulated, which as a result causes special relativity and general relativity to be invalid. The effect of the revised equations proposed by Autodynamics is to cause particle mass to decrease with particle velocity, being exchanged with kinetic energy (with mass being zero and kinetic energy being equal to the rest mass at C). This exchange between mass and energy is the proposed mechanism underlying most of the derived conclusions of Autodynamics.<br /><br />Secondary claims of Autodynamics are the nonexistence of the neutrino, the existence of additional particles that have not been observed by mainstream physicists (including the "picograviton" and the "electromuon"), and the existence of additional decay modes for muons and interaction modes for energetic atomic nuclei. T experimental evidence supports these predictions. In particular, they cite a 1946 experiment by William W. Buechner and Robert J. Van de Graaff which failed to observe any "missing energy" when a high-energy electron beam stopped in a calorimeter[1]; however, this result is also consistent with mainstream physics, which does not predict neutrino emission in an electromagnetic process. Proponents also claim that all published observations of the neutrino are due to experimental errors.<br /><br />A 1999 article in the popular magazine Wired[2] quotes Pierre Noyes, a professor at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, as claiming "most scientists consider Autodynamics little more than a "crackpot theory"". Autodynamics supporters dispute this claim, and say that the design of the experiment performed by Noyes rendered its results useless and therefore did not constitute a definitive refutation of autody

 

[yree]

New look at microwave background may cast doubts on big bang theory<br /><br />http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=17752<br /><br />Light that travels faster than the speed of light From Science Blog<br /><br />http://www.scienceblog.com/light.html?q=node/8725<br /><br />Has ESA's XMM-Newton cast doubt over dark energy?<br /><br />http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEMRHL274OD_Expanding_0.html<br /><br /><br />An invisible hand? Aug 19th 2004 From The Economist print edition An unexplained effect during solar eclipses casts doubt on General Relativity<br /><br />http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3104321<br /><br />A review of conventional explanations of anomalous observations during solar eclipses<br /><br />http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0408/0408023.pdf