The thrust of this article --that we must take steps to "help" less-advanced indigenous peoples remain in their less-advanced state-- is obnoxiously paternalistic. In an earlier age, this was called the "noble savage" philosophy, and such "woke" nonsense is best left in that earlier age. These are not zoo exhibits; they're human beings, with as much right to enjoy the fruits of modern civilization as anyone else.
The author is posting her online article from Australia. I wonder how she would feel had the United States, which was largely responsible for the development of the internet, decided against sharing such an inevitably culture-shaking development with Australia, because we liked "our" Aussies the way they were?
I am as concerned as anyone about the effect that light pollution will have on the science of astronomy, potential effects on animal populations, and the aesthetics of ruining a peaceful night sky. But if some tribe wants to know if it's time to gather emu eggs, they can get a damn calendar.