<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>Thank you for the explanation of hardening the circuits, etc. Did this technology exist in 1969 for the moon shots? If not, why didn't their computers, such as they were, malfunction to the max re solar radiation? <p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />First off, for a little background -- I work for a company that makes computers, mainly embedded systems. One of the projects I'm supporting is a computer for a satellite. We make a bunch of these things, heavily customized to the particular spacecraft, but our most famous is probably Chandra's command & control subsystem. So that's where my knowledge comes from. One caveat: I work in software, so I pick this up mostly by association with the electrical engineers and systems engineers. <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /><br /><br />Apollo computers were rad-hardened, I believe. However, it wasn't anywhere near the problem it is today. You can get a space-qualified CPU today equivalent to a PowerPC 604. (Actually, by now I bet you can find one equivalent to the 750, or even better. I confess I don't follow it as closely as I ought.) RISC processors are popular in this business; all operations are completed in a single cycle, which gives less opportunity for data corruption. But they are very miniaturized. The wires cannot be seen without a microscope. Even a circuit diagram three feet across is amazingly dense and difficult to read. So it takes very little energy to overwhelm it.<br /><br />The Apollo computers, by contrast, are clunky behemoths. They were amazingly small, light, and fast for their time, but by modern standards they're pretty clunky. One of the upsides of this sort of a system is that its sheer size makes it less susceptible to radiation. It's not anywhere near as sensitive. That helped them enormously. Systems in general were not so susceptible. In 1989, a CME caused a geomagnetic storm so intense it actually *melted* transformers on <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em> -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>