right, it's a matter of clarity as vogon says. Our sharpest images can only see so fine a detail (which varies in actual size depending on the telescope, camera, and distance to the object).<br /><br />Just for a scale here, one astronomical unit (~8 light minutes) spans 1 arcsecond of sky at 3.26 light years (defined as a parsec).<br /><br />So at 3.26 light years..which is closer than the nearest star, an object or change that's one light day in radius (so 2 light days in diameter) is 180 arcseconds across...or 0.1 degrees in the sky. And this is only at ~3 light years. Throw that out to over a thousand light years...and that angle gets much, much smaller.<br /><br />I chose 1 light day, because this is the furthest a change in an object can propagate in one day (with the change happening at the speed of light). I.e. a change on a daily basis is, at best, no larger than this.<br /><br /><br />So it's impossible for modern telescopes to resolve a change of that size. <br /><br />Throw in the fact that the changes aren't drastic (the subtle changes are likely to go unnoticed) and that the changes usually occur at a much slower rate, it it becomes even more impossible. (I.e. impossibler <img src="/images/icons/smile.gif" />) <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p align="center"><font color="#c0c0c0"><br /></font></p><p align="center"><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">--------</font></em></font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">--------</font></em></font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">----</font></em></font><font color="#666699">SaiphMOD@gmail.com </font><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">-------------------</font></em></font></p><p><font color="#999999"><em><font size="1">"This is my Timey Wimey Detector. Goes "bing" when there's stuff. It also fries eggs at 30 paces, wether you want it to or not actually. I've learned to stay away from hens: It's not pretty when they blow" -- </font></em></font><font size="1" color="#999999">The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>