Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Home
Featured
Forums
New posts
Trending
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Billboard
Trophies
Catastrophe's latest activity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
I have no idea of the relevance? Cat :)
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
Think what CMBR stands for. Is R = radiation? Is radiation static? Not in my opinion (knowledge). Where did I ever say radiation...
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
Google gives: Cat :)
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
So the answer is dynamic. Cat :)
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
So how would you describe CMBR ? static, dynamic or what? Cat :)
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
This is playing with semantics. Are they, then, half moving and/or half static? Cat :)
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
A background of (light) radiation consists of a succession of photons, not frozen photons, which would be static. In principle, it is...
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
See my post #57: Google "Can a background move?" Cat :)
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
That is not my point. My point is that a background does not have to be static. CMBR is not static. Cat :)
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
How does this make CMBR a static background? Cat :)
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Argument by analogy
.
Gibsense, As a scientist myself (B.Sc. Hons,, published scientific author (Marcel Dekker and patent holder) I fail to see how "science...
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
Harry Costas's post
in the thread
Question
Infinity or not infinity that is the question.
with
Like
.
I understand
Feb 3, 2025
C
Catastrophe
reacted to
marcin's post
in the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
with
Like
.
I'm really, really glad and thankful that you're here, @Catastrophe
Feb 1, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Basic Error: The accelerating Universe conclusion - reason
.
I have explained catalysis in #209. The ABC example covers alignment and orientation - that is the function of C - to produce molecular...
Feb 1, 2025
C
Catastrophe
replied to the thread
Question
Infinity or not infinity that is the question.
.
No. Not at all. Every person or conscious being has its own observable universe, including Persimultivons on planet Allivonterox 15...
Feb 1, 2025
RESOURCES
Advertising
Cookies Policies
Privacy
Term & Conditions
FOLLOW
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram
Top
Bottom