<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I know space is a massive area, but please correct me if I am wrong. If we measure "things" in space by light years, why couldn't we put that to say, a scale we do know in creating a 3D map? Since space travel seems to be on the horizon, shouldn't we have an effective map in a 3D sense instead of the conventional 2D map ? <br />Posted by Jetta_D</DIV></p><p>Jetta, we do have such maps now.</p><p>They are being updated every day, every so often various groups publish the latest.</p><p>Also they are at different scales. A map showing the local stars would be only a tiny dot in a map of the milky way.</p><p>A map of the Local group of galaxies would be just a smudge on a map of the visible (by light, radio, x-rays, infrared, etc) area we have measured.</p><p>I'll see what I can dig up, but there's more than one answer.</p><p>Great question, welcome to Space.com!</p><p> Here's stars visible to the unaided eye (if you live in a VEEERRRYYY) dark area. If you know what light pollution is, you won't see many of these, but they are the brightest.</p><p>
http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/50lys.html</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>