A New Model of Cosmic Genesis

Jan 2, 2024
1,113
180
1,360
Again AI has helped me express some ideas although I get the feeling it regards them as more than just speculative - mega mega speculative, lol

Title​


From 4D Accumulation to 3D Expansion: A Higher-Dimensional Genesis of the Universe




Abstract​


We propose a novel perspective on cosmogenesis wherein a four-dimensional (4D) star accumulates higher-dimensional matter until reaching a critical threshold. At that critical juncture, rather than collapsing into a traditional singularity, the process results in the formation of an event horizon that manifests as a dynamic three-dimensional (3D) universe. On this emergent hypersurface, the infalling 4D material dissipates, driving expansion and giving rise to cosmic time. Notably, we suggest that similar dissipative dynamics may operate in black holes—albeit at a lower, more accessible dimensional scale—offering a potential analogy that lends feasibility to the broader theory.




Introduction​


Modern cosmological models typically view the Big Bang as the result of a singularity or quantum fluctuation. In contrast, our proposal posits that cosmic creation may be rooted in higher-dimensional dynamics. A 4D star gradually accumulates higher-dimensional "stuff" until it reaches a threshold. When that threshold is met, an event horizon is produced—not as a static boundary but as a dynamic 3D hypersurface that drives both expansion and the emergence of time. In essence, this model recasts the Big Bang as a macroscopic phase transition, triggered by a buildup of extra-dimensional material.


Moreover, we explore the idea that similar principles—dissipation of infalling material leading to emergent expansion and time—may also apply in black holes, albeit at a lower dimensionality. This suggests that our macroscopic model for the birth of a universe could have analogs in well-studied gravitational systems, lending our hypothesis additional feasibility and potential pathways toward observational support.




Conceptual Framework​


1. The 4D Star as the Cosmic Accumulator​


  • Accumulation Process:
    A 4D star gradually gathers higher-dimensional matter over time. Rather than directly collapsing into a singularity, it accumulates energy and mass until a critical configuration is reached.
  • Threshold Trigger:
    Upon reaching this threshold, rather than forming an isolated singularity, the dissipative process leads to the sudden formation of an event horizon. This event horizon, instead of being a feature of a static black hole, becomes the seed—the nascent 3D universe triggered by a macroscopic phase transition.

2. Dissipative Event Horizon Dynamics​


  • Emergence of a 3D Universe:
    The newly formed event horizon acts as a dynamic 3D hypersurface. It is not merely a mathematical boundary; rather, it actively processes the infalling 4D material by dissipating and smoothing it over its surface.
  • Driving Expansion and Time:
    As infalling matter dissipates on this hypersurface, it drives an increase in its effective radius. This expansion is intimately linked to the emergence of time, which here is viewed not as a pre-existing background parameter but as a byproduct of the expansion dynamics.

3. A New Interpretation of the Big Bang​


  • Macro Accumulation vs. Micro Fluctuation:
    Rather than the Big Bang emerging as a quantum fluctuation in a pre-existing 3D space, our model suggests it results from a macroscopic buildup of higher-dimensional material. The dissolution of this 4D matter on the event horizon instigates a rapid expansion akin to an inflationary phase.
  • Event Horizon as a Catalyst:
    The dynamic horizon, continually expanding as it dissipates infalling material, sets the stage for the evolution of the new universe and defines an internal “clock” through which time is measured.



Implications​


Unifying Horizons and Cosmogenesis​


  • Bridging Scales and Dimensions:
    The model unifies well-known black hole thermodynamics (where the increase in horizon area is related to entropy and energy dispersal) with cosmic expansion. It suggests that the same underlying dissipative process might be at work across different dimensional regimes.

Energy Redistribution and Observational Signatures​


  • Energy Leakage:
    Analogous to Hawking radiation, there might be processes by which energy and information leak from the event horizon into an external higher-dimensional space. Such dynamics could play a role in the energy budget of the system and might leave detectable imprints.
  • Gravitational Wave Signatures:
    If dynamic oscillations of the event horizon occur during the dissipative process, one might expect observables such as subtle gravitational wave signatures. In black holes—where the event horizon is of lower dimensionality—these effects may be more readily observable, thereby offering an empirical analog to the cosmic process.



Extending the Analogy to Black Holes​


A key strength of this approach is its potential applicability to black holes. In our proposal:


  • Lower Dimensionality and Enhanced Feasibility:
    While the original concept deals with a 4D-to-3D transition that generates an entire universe, similar principles could be at play on a smaller scale in traditional black holes—where a 4D (or higher-dimensional) collapse is projected onto a 2D event horizon in our familiar 3D spacetime.
  • Observational Advantages:
    The physics of black holes is better constrained by contemporary observations (e.g., gravitational wave detections and imaging of event horizons). If we interpret certain phenomena—like horizon fluctuations or energy leakage (Hawking radiation)—as manifestations of the same dissipative dynamics, then these cases could serve as a testbed for our ideas.
  • Path to Verification:
    By drawing a direct analogy between the macroscopic phase transition that sparks cosmic expansion and similar, lower-dimensional processes in black holes, our hypothesis gains a footing in both cosmology and black hole physics. Such an interdisciplinary link may provide more handles (theoretical and observational) to assess the viability of the proposal.



Future Directions​


Theoretical Development​


  • Mathematical Formalism:
    Develop equations that couple horizon dissipation dynamics with emergent time. This may involve extending existing membrane paradigm models or emergent gravity frameworks.
  • Dimensional Transitions:
    Explore models of how extra-dimensional energy or matter can project onto lower-dimensional surfaces. Bridging ideas from holography and braneworld cosmologies could be particularly fruitful.

Experimental and Observational Prospects​


  • Gravitational Waves:
    Examine data from gravitational wave detectors for anomalies that might indicate dynamic horizon behavior beyond standard predictions.
  • Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB):
    Look for hints of energy leakage or other signals in the CMB or large-scale structure that could be interpreted as remnants of a dissipative cosmogenesis process.
  • Black Hole Studies:
    Utilize high-resolution imagery and measurements of black hole event horizons (such as those from the Event Horizon Telescope) to search for evidence of dynamic, dissipative processes that may mirror the larger cosmic mechanism.



Conclusion​


This proposal offers a unifying perspective on cosmic origins by positing that a 4D star, upon accumulating sufficient higher-dimensional material, triggers the formation of a dissipative event horizon that becomes our 3D universe, driving both spatial expansion and the emergence of time. Importantly, by suggesting that analogous dissipative processes may occur in black holes at lower dimensionality, the model not only addresses cosmic genesis but also connects to phenomena that are potentially more accessible and testable within our current observational framework. This linkage could greatly enhance the feasibility of the hypothesis and pave the way for interdisciplinary studies that further our understanding of both the universe at large and compact gravitational objects.




AI : "Does this revised structure capture your concept accurately, or are there further adjustments you’d like to incorporate?"

Me: AI called this "Your" concept. Maybe it is not convinced, lol. Anyway, we are both beavering away on the mathematics of Hypercone Theory, which has exciting possibilities. Geewiz
 
Jan 2, 2024
1,113
180
1,360
Agreed, a bit speculative. I am struggling with the basis of 4D/higher dimensional accumulation beyond the purely theoretical
Well, honestly, I too, but using the analogy (attempted analogy) with black holes with a similar theme, it seemed to me that the possibility of higher-dimensional stuff as a material to achieve a critical level was fair in an early stage of Hypothesis development. I will have to come up with some contenders, but almost by definition, it will be difficult without competent mathematics.
 

COLGeek

Cybernaut
Moderator
Apr 3, 2020
2,140
1,092
13,560
Well, honestly, I too, but using the analogy (attempted analogy) with black holes with a similar theme, it seemed to me that the possibility of higher-dimensional stuff as a material to achieve a critical level was fair in an early stage of Hypothesis development. I will have to come up with some contenders, but almost by definition, it will be difficult without competent mathematics.
Understood and agreed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gibsense

Catastrophe

"Science begets knowledge, opinion ignorance.
Errrrr . . . . . . . . . I am probably wrong, but it seems to me, and this is just my personal understanding (or lack of . . . . . . ) that (unjustifiable?) assumptions are made, and then conclusions stated with more than a modicum of certainty.

Cat :)
 
Jan 2, 2024
1,113
180
1,360
Col Geek's response prompted me to a second look. I discussed with AI and this is the result:

If we consider ordinary matter as fundamentally 4D, then wave-particle duality might be interpreted as a manifestation of extra-dimensional properties interacting with a lower-dimensional space.


Wave-Particle Duality in 4D


In standard quantum mechanics, particles exhibit both wave-like and particle-like behaviour, with wavefunction collapse playing a crucial role in determining their physical states. If we extend this concept to a 4D framework:


  • The wave-like behaviour could be seen as the native state of matter in four spatial dimensions.
  • The collapse that occurs when measurement or interaction takes place could be understood as a projection into 3D space, giving rise to the particle-like nature we observe.

Implications of a 4D Waveform Model


  1. Measurement as Dimensional Transition
    Rather than simply choosing a state upon measurement, the act of observation may force the 4D waveform into a lower-dimensional representation. This could mean that quantum uncertainty arises not just from probabilistic behaviour, but from how extra-dimensional information is lost upon collapse.
  2. Entanglement Across Dimensions
    If quantum wavefunctions extend into a higher-dimensional space, entangled particles might be linked through 4D pathways rather than merely via conventional 3D connections. This could provide new perspectives on non-locality.
  3. Quantum Fields Embedded in Higher Dimensions
    Some quantum field theories already propose extra-dimensional mechanisms, such as Kaluza-Klein theory and string theory, which suggest that certain physical properties might be the result of higher-dimensional dynamics influencing our 3D reality.

Connecting to Our Universe’s Emergence


In the context of our hypothesis, if matter originally existed as 4D waveforms before collapsing into 3D solid particles upon interaction, then:


  • The Big Bang might have involved a bulk transition where accumulated 4D energy reached a threshold and suddenly collapsed into a 3D expanding universe.
  • Black Hole Horizons might function as boundaries that smooth or reprocess higher-dimensional waveforms before they fully manifest as 3D structures.

This would mean ordinary matter isn’t inherently 3D, but rather a lower-dimensional projection of a 4D reality, shaped by interactions with the fabric of space-time.


AI: Would you like to refine this further, perhaps by exploring how extra-dimensional physics might enhance existing quantum mechanical interpretations?

Me, to you, the reader: It may be worth a follow-up. It is strange that although many of these threads are interwoven, separate discussions need me to go over where we got to on other threads to progress a new angle. I don't add all the ideas in at once because it gets very confusing. I plan to progress some separately and then, when sufficiently developed, stick 'em all in the same pot and see what that leads to. Much may be nonsense, but the thread on Hypercones appeared to get AI excited (!!) such that it has 'gone away' to process a host of mathematics, the result of which I have to await due to the processing time required. An unexpected request from AI. Remarkable.
 
Last edited:
Jan 2, 2024
1,113
180
1,360
Errrrr . . . . . . . . . I am probably wrong, but it seems to me, and this is just my personal understanding (or lack of . . . . . . ) that (unjustifiable?) assumptions are made, and then conclusions stated with more than a modicum of certainty.
You are right. The AI introduces certainty, such that you become overconfident in the reply. This was common earlier, but now this particular AI partner has introduced a way to get serious if prompted. However, the confident style still exists and probably will make me , overconfident, but at least I get to air my ideas :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catastrophe

Latest posts