A universe that expands relative to the observer

[Nick Astraeus]

The game of fundamental physics is to derive as much as possible from the fewest and simplest propositions.

In the spirit of that game, here is a series of 60-second arguments, in which I address some of the major problems of modern physics, working from these two basic propositions:

(1) the universe expands relative to the observer
(2) there are multiple observers

Skepticism about one or all of these arguments is, of course, fine. But keep in mind that, in the context of this game, the ultimate measure of success is whether a single model can unite and explain the seemingly disparate problems of modern physics.

Foundations of quantum mechanics, part 1, the double slit experiment:

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/SSfHNhIlY54

Foundations of quantum mechanics, part 2, the uncertainty principle:

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/ftfhClZu8d4

Dark energy:

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/x7GrPLdjaRc

The vacuum catastrophe:

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/Ka2sQH-jxmE

 

[marcin]

Dark energy:

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/x7GrPLdjaRc

Do the observable universes need light to be observable? Do they need it to exert negative pressure on each other or can they expand without it?

I commented your short on the same topic on yt. If your observable universes need light, then we have a common ground.

 

[Fire-Starter James]

There are three basic ways to observe an object:

1. You throw stuff at the object that causes it to throw stuff at you.
2. Something else throws stuff at the object that causes it to throw stuff at you.
3. The object just throws stuff at you.
The stuff does not have to be light. It could be something else.

More later. Your two basic premises are sound, solid ground.