V
vidargander
Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'> <span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">In step 3 it says "Here's the magic". That is correct, it is magic and not true physics. The spring is 3x as efficient in transmitting the force ? Nope. ……. There will be a net force that will cancel the motion as the weights are brought back to center. </font></font></span></p><p><span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">But let me tease you with one, similar in nature, that's not so easily disproven. ……. This goes on ad nasuem turning electricity into motion w/o expelling mass. Violates conservation of momentum but why won't it work .....</font></font></span><br />Posted by mee_n_mac</DIV><span><font face="Times New Roman" size="2"> </font></span></p><p><span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">Please explain ….. </font></font></span><span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">An image would help to see the answer.</font></font></span><span><font face="Times New Roman" size="2"> </font></span></p><p><span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">Anyhow, I still think that it is possible to make some of the thrust convert to other kinds of energy, like vibrations and heat. Still I think that it’s possible to make it larger in the backwards thrust than the forward thrust. Then the net result will be forward motion in the frictionless space.</font></font></span><span><font face="Times New Roman" size="2"> </font></span> </p><p style="margin-top:0cm;margin-left:0cm;margin-right:0cm" class="MsoNormal"><span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2">Can you also argue why any such differential thrust is impossible?</font></font></span></p><p style="margin-top:0cm;margin-left:0cm;margin-right:0cm" class="MsoNormal"> </p><span><font face="Times New Roman"><font size="2"> </font></font></span> <p><br /><br /> </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>