Your name, <font color="yellow">cyclonebuster,</font>indicates a possible interest in hurricanes, <br />so let me try this:<br /><br />Imagine a hurricane forms in the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Africa, <br />heading toward the East coast of the USA. Initial predictions may have <br />it hitting land 200 miles north of Charleston, South Carolina, but the <br />cone of uncertainty goes from Miami to Baltimore. More data is gathered<br />and the cone of uncertainty shrinks to include only the coasts of Georgia,<br />South Carolina and North Carolina. At the same time, the predicted most<br />likely landfall moves closer to Charleston by 100 miles, is is now predicted <br />to hit 100 miles north of Charleston. More data is collected and the cone<br />of uncertainty shrinks to include only the Coast of North Carolina. <br />Charleston is no longer even considered a potential landfall site.<br /><br />If you follow hurricane activity at all, you must have seen this sort of<br />scenario many times. We here in Florida live it every year! It can be<br />frustrating but that is what happens when dealing with a situation <br />where you are trying to make predictions based on imperfect information<br />that only gets better as the event, whether it's an asteroid crossing<br />an orbit or a hurricane crossing a coastline, draws near.<br /> <br /> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>