This is from the OP referenced article:
"Several public and private entities are currently researching ways to mitigate contrails' effect on the climate. For example, a study by
NASA and DLR (the German Aerospace Center) revealed that sustainable aviation fuel can reduce contrail formation by 50% to 70%. "
The impact of sustainable fuel is stated as fact.
This is from the article it references:
"It's too early to report any conclusive results from the tests, but a quick look at the data seems to indicate that the alternate fuel blend reduces black carbon emissions by more than 30 percent on the ground, with less obvious results in the air, including the alternate fuel's effect on contrail formation.
We don't know if the emissions have any impact on ice particle formation. That's something that will probably be buried in the statistics, and we'll be examining that," Anderson said."
The impact of sustainable fuel is "too early to report", "a quick look seems to indicate". And then they state their underlying model is unproven,
Which one am I supposed to believe?