Decreasing Universe and Hubble's Law derivation

[jocax]

From Decreasing Universe Theory :

Derivation of Hubble’s Law and the End of the Darks Elements

From the “Decreasing Universe” model, establishing the contraction of space tissue when exposed to a gravitational field, we derive the Hubble Law and, from there, we will explain the effects “Dark Energy” and “Dark Matter”.

www.scirp.org

The hubble law could be derived

Evidences from Decreasing Universe
--------------------------------------
A)-VERIFIED

1-Hubble's law formula can be derived (verified)
It's in the theory text.

2-Postulation of dark energy is not necessary (verified)
It's in the theory text.

3-Expansion of the universe doubles every 10 billion years (verified)

"Universe mysteriously expanding, will double in size in 10 billion years, finds Hubble"

Universe expanding mysteriously, will double in size in 10 billion years, finds Hubble

Hubble has studied 42 mile-stones in space and shown that the universe is expanding mysteriously and is on its course to double in size.

www.indiatoday.in

Which was exactly the evidence I was hoping for, that's exactly what my theory predicted:
["...Some Values ??.... Tj=3.15E17?s = 10 billion years
That is, the Jocaxian Time, the time necessary for our space to contract in half, is 10 billion years..."]

4-The Universe is getting hotter (verified)

-Unexpectedly, The Universe Is Getting Hotter and Hotter as It Expands

Unexpectedly, The Universe Is Getting Hotter And Hotter as It Expands

For almost a century, astronomers have understood that the Universe is in a state of expansion.

www.sciencealert.com

5-Comoving and proper distances (verified)

Comoving distance factors out the expansion of the universe,
giving a distance that does not change in time due to the expansion of space
(though this may change due to other, local factors, such as the motion of a galaxy within a cluster).
Comoving distance and proper distance are defined to be equal at the present time.
At other times, the Universe's expansion results in the proper distance changing,
while the comoving distance remains constant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comoving_and_proper_distances

"... is the distance between them which would be measured with rulers at the time they are being observed
(the proper distance) divided by the ratio of the scale factor of the Universe then to now.
In other words the proper distance multiplied by (1 + z)."

Distance Measures in Cosmology

From the equation (E10) from my paper, we have :
D(t) = D0 * exp(H0*t)
( It is the size measured now as a function of the size that would have been measured at the time of photon emission.)
We can then identify as D0 = proper distance.
Substituting
D(t)=Lambta (=L) (wave length reaching us) and D0 = Lambta0 (=L0) ( wave length emited )
We have: L = L0 * exp(H0*t)
So L/L0 = Z + 1 = exp((H0*t) = D / D0
Therefore:
D = D0 * ( Z + 1 ) ( deducted from my paper )



B) ALMOST VERIFIED


6-The postulation of dark matter may not be necessary (to be verified)
It's in the theory text, but rotation curve of galaxy is not very good yet.

C) TO BE VERIFIED
(Consequences of the theory)

7- On average, Galaxies at the same distance, the ones with less mass should have higher redshifts and vice versa (NOT verified yet)

Because the greater mass increase the contraction rate of the galaxy increasing the frequency of light

8-On average, for aspiral galaxy, the more distant the galaxy, the greater the amount of dark matter.

Because the galaxy's radius will appear larger than it actually is.

---------------------
What do you thinK?

 

[COLGeek]

Since the paper was written more than 3 years ago, what progress has been made with it?

What sort of input are you looking for from Space members?

 

[jocax]

Since the paper was written more than 3 years ago, what progress has been made with it?

The progress was about the another evidences I found after published:
1-Expansion of the universe doubles every 10 billion years

2-The comoving distance and Proper distance follow naturaly from theory,

What sort of input are you looking for from Space members?

I would like someone find something wrong in the theory and
if knows the evidence tobe verified ( item C )

 

[jocax]

From Decreasing Universe Theory :

Derivation of Hubble’s Law and the End of the Darks Elements

From the “Decreasing Universe” model, establishing the contraction of space tissue when exposed to a gravitational field, we derive the Hubble Law and, from there, we will explain the effects “Dark Energy” and “Dark Matter”.

www.scirp.org

The hubble law could be derived

Evidences from Decreasing Universe
--------------------------------------
A)-VERIFIED

1-Hubble's law formula can be derived (verified)
It's in the theory text.

2-Postulation of dark energy is not necessary (verified)
It's in the theory text.

3-Expansion of the universe doubles every 10 billion years (verified)

"Universe mysteriously expanding, will double in size in 10 billion years, finds Hubble"

Universe expanding mysteriously, will double in size in 10 billion years, finds Hubble

Hubble has studied 42 mile-stones in space and shown that the universe is expanding mysteriously and is on its course to double in size.

www.indiatoday.in

Which was exactly the evidence I was hoping for, that's exactly what my theory predicted:
["...Some Values ??.... Tj=3.15E17?s = 10 billion years
That is, the Jocaxian Time, the time necessary for our space to contract in half, is 10 billion years..."]

4-The Universe is getting hotter (verified)

-Unexpectedly, The Universe Is Getting Hotter and Hotter as It Expands

Unexpectedly, The Universe Is Getting Hotter And Hotter as It Expands

For almost a century, astronomers have understood that the Universe is in a state of expansion.

www.sciencealert.com

5-Comoving and proper distances (verified)

Comoving distance factors out the expansion of the universe,
giving a distance that does not change in time due to the expansion of space
(though this may change due to other, local factors, such as the motion of a galaxy within a cluster).
Comoving distance and proper distance are defined to be equal at the present time.
At other times, the Universe's expansion results in the proper distance changing,
while the comoving distance remains constant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comoving_and_proper_distances

"... is the distance between them which would be measured with rulers at the time they are being observed
(the proper distance) divided by the ratio of the scale factor of the Universe then to now.
In other words the proper distance multiplied by (1 + z)."

Distance Measures in Cosmology

From the equation (E10) from my paper, we have :
D(t) = D0 * exp(H0*t)
( It is the size measured now as a function of the size that would have been measured at the time of photon emission.)
We can then identify as D0 = proper distance.
Substituting
D(t)=Lambta (=L) (wave length reaching us) and D0 = Lambta0 (=L0) ( wave length emited )
We have: L = L0 * exp(H0*t)
So L/L0 = Z + 1 = exp((H0*t) = D / D0
Therefore:
D = D0 * ( Z + 1 ) ( deducted from my paper )



B) ALMOST VERIFIED


6-The postulation of dark matter may not be necessary (to be verified)
It's in the theory text, but rotation curve of galaxy is not very good yet.

C) TO BE VERIFIED
(Consequences of the theory)

7- On average, Galaxies at the same distance, the ones with less mass should have higher redshifts and vice versa (NOT verified yet)

Because the greater mass increase the contraction rate of the galaxy increasing the frequency of light

8-On average, for aspiral galaxy, the more distant the galaxy, the greater the amount of dark matter.

Because the galaxy's radius will appear larger than it actually is.

---------------------
What do you thinK?

Here is some CONSEQUENCE of this theory:
the distance as a function ofredshift

https://medcraveonline.com/AAOAJ/AAOAJ-09-00220.pdf

 

[jocax]

This is Interesting : "...Principle of equivalenceLet us now understand, or at least intuit, that the contraction ofspace by the gravitational field is something that should almost beexpected. Consider the following:Suppose you are in a rocket with its engines on, accelerating. Whatdoes the theory of relativity say?It states that the space inside the rocket will be continuously*contracted* in the direction of motion. Now, if we invoke the Principleof Equivalence, what would we conclude? If contraction occurs insidethe accelerating rocket (as it indeed does), then something similarshould also happen in a gravitational field. Although this argumentis not a formal proof- since the Principle of Equivalence cannot bestrictly applied in this case- it provides an intuition that this theory isnot as far-fetched as it might initially seem...."