Does a neutrino have mass? How do atoms work?

[jhixon]

Why are there 3 quarks to a proton, 3 quarks to a neutron, 3 types of electrons, 3 types of movement? What is the meaning of the number three in quantum/atoms? The physics definition of atoms- The number three is the smallest system with “two functions” and three phases of matter by energy level are a solid, liquid, and gas are “atoms”. What are the two functions of this atomic system? A function and it’s inverse function. Matter would be the function, and the inverse function of matter is anti-matter.

The matter-antimatter asymmetry problem

Current physics says a particle and its antiparticle, a proton, which is matter, is made of two up quarks and one down quark; and its corresponding antiparticle, the antiproton, is made of two up antiquarks and one down antiquark (for example, a proton and an antiproton) have the same mass, but opposite electric charge. This is two regular matter protons and they have two different/opposite electrical charges and can cancel each other out electrically, but this is not antimatter. This is actually a function of energy and the inverse function of energy, and not a function of matter and an inverse function of anti-matter.

A neutron is made of two down quarks and one up quark, is regular matter that’s neutrally charged and its corresponding antiparticle, a neutrino or anti-neutron is made of two up antiquarks and one down antiquark, and displaces space/time/forces and is antimatter. Neutrinos pass through matter because they are antimatter of similar composition (spooky action). Of course, to see antimatter in a larger version would be extremely difficult because it does not give off photons as anti-matter absorbs photons, however you can look at Kepler 19B, which shows the gravitational waves of an object/planet, but when observing through a telescope it doesn’t reflect any light at all, so it’s not visible when viewing. Scientists weighed a neutrino on a scale (right side up like weighing regular matter) and since a neutrino is anti-matter with an upward/opposite trajectory to gravity, it appeared to be weightless when they measured it. Matter is pulled down towards the center of the object/planet by gravity, and anti-matter has an inversed force or upward/opposite trajectory to gravity. If the scale was mounted upside down to weight it, since its forces are inversed or pushing its mass upward, it will have a weight of 1.00727 AMU.

This is describing the “quantum nature of atoms”, so the two functions are a function and an inverse function for energy, energy flow, matter, nuclear strong force, weak force/time/decay, electromagnetic force/field and gravity. Let’s talk about gravity specifically, Newton's 2nd Law of motion says the “direction of the force moves the object in the same direction”. A black hole pushes it's force on a galaxy, and does the “direction of the force move the object in the same direction”? No, it’s in reverse to Newton's 2nd Law. This shows the inverse function to gravity is anti-gravity and neutrinos are anti-matter having anti-gravity. As soon as someone measures a neutrino with the scale mounted upside down, then we will have the first indication of anti-matter with anti-gravity. So if you know anyone working on this amazing project, please ask them to weigh the neutrino with the scale mounted upside down. I’m so excited to finally see new physics, so please help science move forward. Life is Beautiful….

 

[promytius]

Your reading of the second law is interesting. This quote is from physicsclassroom.com:
"Newton's second law of motion pertains to the behavior of objects for which all existing forces are not balanced. The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object. The acceleration of an object depends directly upon the net force acting upon the object, and inversely upon the mass of the object. As the force acting upon an object is increased, the acceleration of the object is increased. As the mass of an object is increased, the acceleration of the object is decreased."
It is not referring to direction. It is referring to speed.

 

[jhixon]

Your reading of the second law is interesting. This quote is from physicsclassroom.com:
"Newton's second law of motion pertains to the behavior of objects for which all existing forces are not balanced. The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object. The acceleration of an object depends directly upon the net force acting upon the object, and inversely upon the mass of the object. As the force acting upon an object is increased, the acceleration of the object is increased. As the mass of an object is increased, the acceleration of the object is decreased."
It is not referring to direction. It is referring to speed.

 

[jhixon]

"The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object. The acceleration of an object depends directly upon the net force acting upon the object, and inversely upon the mass of the object."

This explanation is not correct, see below. You use G for gravity formulas involving our solar system and you use -G for gravity at black holes, so your use of math is reflecting these motions are different, regardless of any explanation you want to give. Observation and math together shows the truth. Lastly, it's not mass that curves space. Newton's formula F=MA is actually using calculus, which calculates the curve of an object as that's what calculus does. When Newton wrote F=MA, he knew his math calculated the volume of the object or mass divided by volume (Newton's calculus) equals density. As it's the density that pushes the forces out and can be written as F=M/V*A when not using calculus, or when explaining how the forces work, so it's not mass alone. Everything written in textbooks aren't all correct, however most of it is correct. Example: the moon faces us all of the time. Scientists say it's Tidal force that does this. Tidal force is not a force in this universe. It's actually the 5th force, or the splitting of matter called entanglement as the moon was once part of Earth.

This is the exact quote from Isaac Newton on the second law of motion: “The acceleration of an object is directly proportional to the net force acting on it and inversely proportional to its mass. "The direction of the acceleration is in the direction of the applied net force.” This shows the direction of applied force is the direction of acceleration, so there is two directions of gravity, gravity and antigravity. A function and it's inverse function as the definition for atoms is correct.