If person A was to claim ownership of a parcel on the Moon, and person B paid him $100 for it, no government would interfere. If it was a binding contract, the courts would probably entertain a civil suit for non payment. If person B was to go there and claim it, plant a flag and declare it to be Moonistan, nobody would object. If person B was to apply for a seat in the UN general assembly for Moonistan, he would be rejected. If person B was to find interlopers in Moonistan, and was to ask the US for military assistance to defend himself, he would be rejected. <br /><br />[humor] <br /><br />And if Hillary was to be asked about assistance to Moonistan she would reply:<br /><br />"Bill, Bill, Bill - I am saddened that you are so ill informed. Why, I hear this question from young and old as I cross this great country of ours. While addressing this policy will be one of the mainstays of my administration, we certainly don't have time right now and here to delve into such a complicated issue. But I must ask you this: Why are you obsessed with such a matter when Bush and Cheney are shredding the constitution by denying your civil liberties and invading friendly countries?" <br /><br />[/humor] <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p> </p> </div>