e=mc2

[Astronoid]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>The problem is, a forum is a media where you must be able to communicate somewhat clearly for it to have any value to the community. I don't know of a solution... <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I feel, and this is only my opinion, that there should be a method of conduct executed by people of intelligence, and that is one of pleansantry... a, if you will, proper conduct...also incorporated into that should be tolerance. &nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>If someone posts something that is in disagreance with views or even if it is illogical and possibly taking on a form of "incoherent babeling" a person having an intelligence which is high should demonstrate the tolerance of such, and comment in a way which is fitting to the emotional integrity of the said individual.&nbsp; Even if you do not know what mental conditions the person has or does not have, people should, having this insight into existence, know that there are many factors which destruct society... and why be a part of it. &nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>As far as this forum being a form of communication and presenting things which can be understood, again I would like to point to a lesser degree of fascism, I should, given the current progress of superpowers, be allowed to say things which are not coherrent if placed in the proper section... which I believe I did. &nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>I would like to state that if the Unexplained section is not a place where such things can exist, there should be another section added which allows for such... &nbsp; i.e. the inchorrent rambling section...&nbsp; because there will always be a degree of people coming into this site which are similar to me and have the same rights... if you do not want it to effect the "normal" threads then make a new section and place what things I have said into that. &nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>One more thing, people "should" be nice, even if another feels superior to them. &nbsp; </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h234/orgling/smileycollabpngzz6-1.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket" /> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>&nbsp;I feel, and this is only my opinion, that there should be a method of conduct executed by people of intelligence, and that is one of pleansantry... a, if you will, proper conduct...also incorporated into that should be tolerance. &nbsp;&nbsp;If someone posts something that is in disagreance with views or even if it is illogical and possibly taking on a form of "incoherent babeling" a person having an intelligence which is high should demonstrate the tolerance of such, and comment in a way which is fitting to the emotional integrity of the said individual.&nbsp; Even if you do not know what mental conditions the person has or does not have, people should, having this insight into existence, know that there are many factors which destruct society... and why be a part of it. &nbsp;&nbsp;</DIV></p><p>Huh. Your views are not explained well enough so that there could even be any disagreement. Sorry. And your mental conditions have no bearing on the situation, as painful as that may be to accept. We can only digest your words and your ideas. Tolerance is one thing, meaningless words are quite another.</p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>As far as this forum being a form of communication and presenting things which can be understood, again I would like to point to a lesser degree of fascism, I should, given the current progress of superpowers, be allowed to say things which are not coherrent if placed in the proper section... which I believe I did. &nbsp;&nbsp;</DIV></p><p>Meaningless words with no point are unfortunately just that.</p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>I would like to state that if the Unexplained section is not a place where such things can exist, there should be another section added which allows for such... &nbsp; i.e. the inchorrent rambling section...&nbsp; </DIV></p><p>No, there would be no useful purpose to such a section on a science discussion board. If you would like to seek out some other place on "Teh Interwebz" where such stuff would be accepted, you are free to do so. If you want a place to do that, start your own forum where it is accepted.</p><p>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>&nbsp;there will always be a degree of people coming into this site which are similar to me and have the same rights... if you do not want it to effect the "normal" threads then make a new section and place what things I have said into that. &nbsp;&nbsp;One more thing, people "should" be nice, even if another feels superior to them. &nbsp; <br />Posted by Astronoid</DIV></p><p>We have actually been very nice considering the "content" of your posts. A great amount of&nbsp;tolerance has been awarded you in respect of your alleged mental condition. Otherwise, you would have been toasted by now.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Wayne</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[Astronoid]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Huh. Your views are not explained well enough so that there could even be any disagreement. Sorry. And your mental conditions have no bearing on the situation, as painful as that may be to accept. We can only digest your words and your ideas. Tolerance is one thing, meaningless words are quite another.Meaningless words with no point are unfortunately just that.No, there would be no useful purpose to such a section on a science discussion board. If you would like to seek out some other place on "Teh Interwebz" where such stuff would be accepted, you are free to do so. If you want a place to do that, start your own forum where it is accepted.We have actually been very nice considering the "content" of your posts. A great amount of&nbsp;tolerance has been awarded you in respect of your alleged mental condition. Otherwise, you would have been toasted by now.&nbsp;Wayne <br /> Posted by MeteorWayne</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>"toasted" &nbsp; = )</p><p>&nbsp; </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h234/orgling/smileycollabpngzz6-1.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket" /> </div>

 

[Astronoid]

If you can say that I incoherently babel than I can say your posts lack civil behavior and compassion...&nbsp; seeing as saying I am incoherrently babeling is a direct reflection of the "substance of my threads" and saying your posts are not civil and lack compassion is the same. &nbsp;&nbsp; <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h234/orgling/smileycollabpngzz6-1.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket" /> </div>

 

[MeteorWayne]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>If you can say that I incoherently babel than I can say your posts lack civil behavior and compassion...&nbsp; seeing as saying I am incoherrently babeling is a direct reflection of the "substance of my threads" and saying your posts are not civil and lack compassion is the same. &nbsp;&nbsp; <br />Posted by Astronoid</DIV><br /><br />Whether they might lack compassion or not is a moot point. The fact is, here you are judged by the content (i.e. ideas clearly expressed) in your words. I could just as easily say your posts are meaningless as you could say mine lack compassion. Perhaps both are true. In any case, when you express cogent ideas, we can discuss them.</p><p>&nbsp;</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>

 

[Astronoid]

= ) <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h234/orgling/smileycollabpngzz6-1.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket" /> </div>

 

[CalliArcale]

<p>MW is correct -- here you are judged on content, not on anything to do with yourself.&nbsp; That's enormously liberating, in many ways, because it allows your views to be received without prejudice.&nbsp; (Well, sort of.&nbsp; Some folks have quite strong opinions already on certain topics, such as the moon landing and the Face on Mars thing.&nbsp; But even then, the prejudice relates to the ideas, not the person presenting them.)</p><p>I don't think anyone intends to belittle you when they say they don't understand what you're saying.&nbsp; They're just saying that, well, they don't understand you.&nbsp; It's not that it's uncivil.&nbsp; It's that they have a choice between telling you that they don't understand, and simply ignoring you altogether.&nbsp; I think it's better for them to seek clarification than for them to just write you off, don't you?&nbsp; ;-)</p><p>Incidentally, if you feel like discussing your schizophrenia, we have a forum called "Health and Human Biology" where mental health issues do get discussed.&nbsp; It's also a good place to look for emotional support on all sorts of health issues. </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em>  -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>

 

[Astronoid]

<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>MW is correct -- here you are judged on content, not on anything to do with yourself.&nbsp; That's enormously liberating, in many ways, because it allows your views to be received without prejudice.&nbsp; (Well, sort of.&nbsp; Some folks have quite strong opinions already on certain topics, such as the moon landing and the Face on Mars thing.&nbsp; But even then, the prejudice relates to the ideas, not the person presenting them.)I don't think anyone intends to belittle you when they say they don't understand what you're saying.&nbsp; They're just saying that, well, they don't understand you.&nbsp; It's not that it's uncivil.&nbsp; It's that they have a choice between telling you that they don't understand, and simply ignoring you altogether.&nbsp; I think it's better for them to seek clarification than for them to just write you off, don't you?&nbsp; ;-)Incidentally, if you feel like discussing your schizophrenia, we have a forum called "Health and Human Biology" where mental health issues do get discussed.&nbsp; It's also a good place to look for emotional support on all sorts of health issues. <br /> Posted by CalliArcale</DIV></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>To me it is already over with, but I will one last time reiterate what I was saying...&nbsp; it was not the critizism of the subject, I can handle people telling me "they" think I am wrong, it is the "tone" or "attitude" of the critizism, it was my belief that Meteorwayne was intending to insult me and belittle me.&nbsp; Like I said though I am over it. &nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p> &nbsp; </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <img src="http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h234/orgling/smileycollabpngzz6-1.png" border="0" alt="Photobucket" /> </div>