Electromagnetism, Gravity and Black Holes Explained!

[Zachary Alexander P.]

After about a decade of physics research, I've put all my studies and obsession of knowledge integrated thought processing into a video nutshell as an attempt to explain the unexplainable...
Enjoy!

Feel free to ask me questions!

 

[Zachary Alexander P.]

Just as the Mandelbrot set is generated entirely by a mathematical equation, so is my simulation of this galaxy, except I did it entirely with vector sine wave interference within a volumetric domain because photons operate similar to vectors with position and direction:

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/SvfR6BtDV6Y?feature=shared

 

[Zachary Alexander P.]

A short video I made explaining some unique galaxies:

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/ZqydBg92LyE

Here is one of my latest renders that briefly explains neutron stars:

View: https://youtube.com/shorts/tpmjRk_vSKc?feature=share

View: https://youtu.be/dt7tbBado5Y?feature=shared

 

[Gibsense]

After about a decade of physics research, I've put all my studies and obsession of knowledge integrated thought processing into a video nutshell as an attempt to explain the unexplainable...
Enjoy!

Feel free to ask me questions!

Let's start with the opening statements.

You say that light has a 'constant' speed from 'drag' due to the local mass and electromagnetic fields which is why the speed of an emitter and light do not add up to a new larger number. I suppose you would suggest that the reason the impact speed between light and an object approaching still does not add up is drag (no emitter involved)? How does that work?

I suppose that a 'switched off' emitter changes nothing? If so why mention it? The fact that a light photon travels at 'c' always irrespective of field strength, say between galaxies, means that regardless of this there is some mysterious balancing cause at work; what is it?

Your ability to illustrate is very impressive (respect) but your cosmology is er fantastical

We all have some competence in our expert field and as so attempt to explain everything within it. Mine is Supply Chain Management but try as I might I have not succeeded. Collaboration seems to be the answer but in my case it still has not worked

 

[Classical Motion]

Two laser beams will NOT interact with one another unless there is a charge at the beam's intersection.

 

[Zachary Alexander P.]

Let's start with the opening statements.
You say that light has a 'constant' speed from 'drag' due to the local mass and electromagnetic fields which is why the speed of an emitter and light do not add up to a new larger number. I suppose you would suggest that the reason the impact speed between light and an object approaching still does not add up is drag (no emitter involved)? How does that work?

Yes, I am suggesting that the reason the impact speed between light and an approaching object still does not add or subtract is due to "drag" (for lack of a better word) because the medium which carries the photon is the overall surrounding EM field which is interconnected and affected by all electron matter within its proximity. Think of the field as an object directly tied to all electrons that can carry waves that can refract or change in speed and adjust according to an average of parameters at a certain location. Lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) beam's cannot change in speed otherwise they would be highly inaccurate at determining the speed of any moving matter. But if the Lidar is used at the bottom of the ocean near a polar icecap, if it were to travel through ice, then water, then heavy water, its readings on the speed of a torpedo would be inaccurate unless the volume size, boundaries and refraction parameters were done in aftermath.

I suppose that a 'switched off' emitter changes nothing? If so why mention it? The fact that a light photon travels at 'c' always irrespective of field strength, say between galaxies, means that regardless of this there is some mysterious balancing cause at work; what is it?

The speed of light not directly tied to the strength of a field, but its propagation is. Light waves propagate much more effectively near the sun compared to earth. Light and sound waves propagate by different means, but light propagation is somewhat analogous to sound waves requiring a non-vacuum medium to travel. Light waves require an electromagnetic field. The strength of a magnetic field or electric field does not directly affect the speed of light, but the density and energy of the charged particles within it does and the particles generate magnetic and electric fields. So its a bit counterintuitive. Anyways, there is really no way to get rid of all EM fields to test this unless you were able to travel outside our solar system away from the electromagnetic sun to the center of the Boötes Void and try to turn on a laser. Even the laser has to be made of atoms and the presence of electrons in the resonator of a laser can generate an EM field that can propagate the beam to a certain limited distance even in the electron deficient space of the Boötes Void.

 

[Zachary Alexander P.]

Two laser beams will NOT interact with one another unless there is a charge at the beam's intersection.

Nobody likes a "know it all" because someone who knows everything becomes some kind of authority and its in man's nature to resist and rebel.
I agree, I do not know everything about light, but I am attempting to understand some of it and so far it appears to make sense.

Two laser beams will not interact unless there is a charge at the beam's intersection. This is true and there is a reason why and I can get back to you for an answer, but I wonder, do you know why?

 

[Classical Motion]

Didn’t mean to offend. I wish I did know it all. The interaction and superposition of EM depends on the state of the EM field. Angular or linear state. An acceleration state or a velocity state. Different rules and interactions with different states and combinations of states.

It sounds complicated but actually is simple. It’s blending handedness and the difference between velocity and acceleration. Takes a little time but simple steps.

A charge particle is a EM field converter. And the only source and the only sink, AND the only surface area for ALL EM fields.

That’s why when you drop one in the intersection and two lasers, the beams will interfere with each other. With no charge, it’s only a temporary spacial occupancy. Not a field interaction. But with a particle there is interaction. And a change in the beams.

Just an opinion, I’ll disturb no further. Didn’t mean to cloud you up.

 

[Zachary Alexander P.]

Didn’t mean to offend. I wish I did know it all. The interaction and superposition of EM depends on the state of the EM field. Angular or linear state. An acceleration state or a velocity state. Different rules and interactions with different states and combinations of states.

It sounds complicated but actually is simple. It’s blending handedness and the difference between velocity and acceleration. Takes a little time but simple steps.

A charge particle is a EM field converter. And the only source and the only sink, AND the only surface area for ALL EM fields.

That’s why when you drop one in the intersection and two lasers, the beams will interfere with each other. With no charge, it’s only a temporary spacial occupancy. Not a field interaction. But with a particle there is interaction. And a change in the beams.

Just an opinion, I’ll disturb no further. Didn’t mean to cloud you up.

Good explanation. I've studied the Lorentz equation and its fascinating. I need to study it more and do more computer simulations on it. I honestly do not know everything and will be learning for the rest of my life. It reminds me of a quote from the movie "Ghost in the Darkness".
Val Kilmer asked: "Have you ever failed in anything?" Michael Douglas replied: "Only in life".
In my opinion, if you are a bad learner or think you don't need to learn anything, you will fail at life. You'll also fail if you don't fight to stop troublemaker bullies.

 

[Gibsense]

There are so many issues in your posts! I like your attempt to involve loads of stuff but it gets a bit confusing for me. We agree on some basics do we?

• The speed of light in a vacuum is 'c' approx. 300000km / sec
• Light speed varies in other materials (not really because it gets absorbed and rereleased at the quantum level)
• Gravity permeates the universe but weakly at distance (from 'well' sources)
• Electromagnetic fields permeate the universe also
• Time, distance and mass can be dilated by speed and gravity wells (dilated as in slowed, shortened or increased relatively depending on the subject)
• Any interaction with light is always at 'c'
• Light has a rest mass of zero

Do your ideas agree with these basics? there may be more added by others. It's just a suggestion to help you assess stuff. Just trying to be helpful. It's worth checking what I have said above on some trusted up to date media. I say trusted because anyone can make an error or tell lies etc.

At the end of the day it is fun, even Roger Penrose and Stephen Hawking engaged in wild hypothesis on this and that but always with a fact check in the end.