C
centsworth_II
Guest
I'm confused. Remote sensing from Mars orbit has given an increasingly detailed picture of subsurface water on Mars. My major concern was the extent to which liquid water could be distinguished from ice in the data. Now, according to this article, a large portion of Mars' water may not be in the form of water <i>or</i> ice: <br /><br /><i>"Epsom-like salts believed to be common on Mars may be a major source of water there.... 'The Mars Odyssey orbiter recently showed that there may be as much as 10 percent water hidden in the Martian near-surface,' said David Bish....'We were able to show that under Mars-like conditions, magnesium sulfate salts can contain a great deal of water.' "</i><br /><br />Would any water held in the salts as described in the article be <b>in addition</b> to the water already detected? Or is this water included in the data already collected, meaning the amount held in salts reflects a reduction in the amount of water previously though to exist as liquid or ice? <br /><br />The impression I get from the article is that the salt-bound water is not detected by the instruments searching for liquid water and ice and would indeed represent an increase in the over-all estimate of total water on Mars. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>