Geologic Galactic Theory

[sabrom]

Galactic Geologic Time Scale Driver (GGTSD )
Abstract:
From ICS-IUGS Geologic Time Scale chronology, peered intellectual cognizance conjure many pattern(s). A grand geologic causal driver of life has been an object of papers by[1] Raup ( 1983, 26 Ma Astrophysics Driver ) ; [2] Kvet ( 1991,Planetary Equidistant Ruptures ); [3] R Sloan ( 1986, Gradual Dinosaur Extinction...Hell Creek ); [4] Kirschvink ( 1986,PlateTectonics Polar Inertial Interchange ); [5] Lietch ( 1998, ME and Sun's encounters w Galactic Spiral Arms ); [6] Shaviv & Veizer2003, Celestial driver of the Phanerozoic climate? (134Ma intervals);[7] Gillman (2008), Galactic Cycle of extinction. (704Ma cycle); and others. This sypher study resolves a hidden Milky Way structure. An enlightenment paradigm unfolds, as a means to project time-distant event sequences from near in measurable observations.
Discussion:
The sypher is the result of dividing a Period date list in eights, resulting in an equivalent time pattern of the two sets of four. Interestingly, the central Bar transitions have an equivalent geologic signature. While the Galactic Arms are more phase aligned to Global thermal (Sea Level) processes. The expanse of this sypher is the Phanerozoic Eon .
The Phanerozoic Eon Geologic Time Scale documents evolution of Eukaryote as diachronous 419±2ma transitions. These are end Holocene to Silurian-Devonian (-0.4Ma ,419.2ma )=418.8±2Ma, lower Eocene-Oligocene to Ordovician (ice) (33.9ma,453.9ma)=419.5±2Ma, end Cretaceous dinosaur (Campanian Maastrichtian) to Cambrian-Ordovician* (71.5ma,491ma)=419.5±2Ma fading into and Jurassic-Cretaceous to unconstrained Precambrian (144.9Ma,564.4ma)=419.5±2ma.
Differential pattern: +41.52ma +37.68ma + 73.35ma + 57.18ma cypher template with an alternating ±7.668Ma at each Cb.
Example generation of date summation starts at Orion at @-0.4, +Cbn(41.5-7.7)@33.85, +Perseus (37.7) @71.53, +Norma-Cygnus(73.4) @144.88, +shaver(57.2) @202.05, +Cbf(41.5+7.7)@250.84, +Scutum-Crux(37.7) @288.51, +Sagittarius(73.4)@361.86, +Orion(57.2) @419.04; +Cbn(41.5-7.7)@453.29, Perseus(37.7)@490.96,Norma-Cygnus(73.4)@564.31, shaver(57.2)@621.49, Cbf(41.5+7.7)@ 670.21 and, Scutum-Crux(37.1)@707.95 . These scaled as to @ma-ago.
Lost?
Earth is in the minor Orion Arm, 33ma (41.5-7.7) ago was at nearside Central Bar alignment at lower Oligocene. In the Geo-Galactic (computer) diagram SOL's Earth is top center. The Central Bar with its Arms are rotation faster than SOL by +0.86 degrees/ma. Thus, past is clockwise in this diagram, as the Galactic Structure passes SOL. From our perspective the Sagittarius Arm is approaching from the left.
The ±7.7ma offset reveals an accuracy error. Present WIP expands on this distortion causality as perhaps MOND in nature. Mathematics of Electric Plasma Spirals shows a Berkeland magnetic field radius is R^(-0.5). Perhaps the gravitational field is affected in the same manner thus MOND.
Equivalence List:
1) The post PTr Carnian Pluvial Episode is driven by a Million Year chill impulse, same as Oligocene Oi1 Ice. And Ordovician GICE has that same signature.
2) Notice that the large igneous provinces positions are at 180-degree locations of interarm equivalent proximities. Thus, PTr causality has a probable Deccan equivalence.
3) Earth has more phosphor than anywhere else (in space). Venus's atmosphere is directly hit by solar wind, which would strip away its outer layer(s) of light gasses of Phosphorene, pushing it out to Earth. Leading to a (very rare) earth of 'rabid' life evolution.
Forum Addendum
The central bar alignments designated by 1± 0.5 ma chills, alternate ±7.7ma (±6.6degree) for the triple IUGS dating Arm sets. That is tangible data. Given observation of distant Galaxies do not have bent arms, thus a perceived symmetrical quandary. The point being a cyclic repetition is not a "random backdrop". This across the Phanerozoic Eon.
And this study continues:
Given the singular area Carnian Pluvial Episode time dilation, and impossible dual '+/ -' time dilations, amending orbital incongruence with some astronomical measurements, perhaps dilation as an interrupted comb-like effect. Hypothetically, an elliptical orbiting black hole could cause this at perihelion.

 

[COLGeek]

I am getting more of a geometric theory of convenience vibe that draws a pretty picture while playing loosely with facts/assumptions.

I need to ponder on this a bit more.

 

[sabrom]

Slight edit 'divide into every eighth' and a pattern emerges. Minor modifications listed by 'S' terms. The central bar dates may not be by Periods, but they are of significant chill (ICE) events. Events of million-year extent of or by chills. 'S' terms is of significant digits, used here to prepare readers for variations. Geologic Radio dating allowed this pattern to be found very early, as an 8th factor repetition is only four. Variation is less than 1% = (422.9-418.9)/420.

 

[Gibsense]

Extraordinary Co-incidence. Await COLGeek thoughts. I would appreciate a Laymanic description/outline from Sabrom.

 

[COLGeek]

Extraordinary Co-incidence. Await COLGeek thoughts. I would appreciate a Laymanic description/outline from Sabrom.

I am still seeing a convenient pattern where there isn't one from factual perspective. What is the hypothesis for how this pattern came to be?

 

[sabrom]

I am still seeing a convenient pattern where there isn't one from factual perspective. What is the hypothesis for how this pattern came to be?

Factual:
"Events of million-year extent of or by chills. 'S' terms is of significant digits, used here to prepare readers for variations. Geologic Radio dating allowed this pattern to be found very early, as an 8th factor repetition is only four. Variation is less than 1% = (422.9-418.9)/420."
Hypothesis? Theory rather, as this is of 'GS of A' and 'IUGS' dates. Now how it was found was verification of a hypothetical exploration 'is true'. And to date, no contrary comments discovered over a decade of time to include BAUT and Astronomy forms. The discovered 420ma cycle is very close to: [7] Gillman (2008), Galactic Cycle of extinction. (704Ma cycle).

 

[COLGeek]

Factual:
"Events of million-year extent of or by chills. 'S' terms is of significant digits, used here to prepare readers for variations. Geologic Radio dating allowed this pattern to be found very early, as an 8th factor repetition is only four. Variation is less than 1% = (422.9-418.9)/420."
Hypothesis? Theory rather, as this is of 'GS of A' and 'IUGS' dates. Now how it was found was verification of a hypothetical exploration 'is true'. And to date, no contrary comments discovered over a decade of time to include BAUT and Astronomy forms. The discovered 420ma cycle is very close to: [7] Gillman (2008), Galactic Cycle of extinction. (704Ma cycle).
Layman:
The search is for causation of Period (significance) levels. The diagram should be your layman description. Please elaborate and state your profession.

Profession? What is the relevance of that question?

The diagram is the issue. It is too symmetrical. Thus the geometric comment earlier. It appears you fit factors into a model and produced this.

Surely you can appreciate the skepticism.

 

[sabrom]

Profession? What is the relevance of that question?

The diagram is the issue. It is too symmetrical. Thus the geometric comment earlier. It appears you fit factors into a model and produced this.

Surely you can appreciate the skepticism.

The model is Georgelan and Georgelan 1976 VLA mapping [8] The Spiral Structure of Our Galaxy Determined from HII Regions Y,M.Georgelin Obervatoirye de Marseille. The pattern fits all known peered facts. The relevance is in knowing your audience. 'Who is Gibsense' determines and guides my terminology.

 

[COLGeek]

The model is Georgelan and Georgelan 1976 VLA mapping [8] The Spiral Structure of Our Galaxy Determined from HII Regions Y,M.Georgelin Obervatoirye de Marseille. The pattern fits all known peered facts. The relevance is in knowing your audience. 'Who is Gibsense' determines and guides my terminology.

Well, I don't know anything about Gibsense.

Galaxy structure is your guide? How does that align with non-spiral galaxies?

Pattern recognition, even when not based on tangible factors, is something the human brain is suited for. That is what I see here. The periods and alignments of your model seems to be doing just that, finding a "repeating pattern" against the random backdrop of the galaxy.

Just how I see it from my perspective.

 

[sabrom]

Well, I don't know anything about Gibsense.

Galaxy structure is your guide? How does that align with non-spiral galaxies?

Pattern recognition, even when not based on tangible factors, is something the human brain is suited for. That is what I see here. The periods and alignments of your model seems to be doing just that, finding a "repeating pattern" against the random backdrop of the galaxy.

Just how I see it from my perspective.

Non-spiral galaxy is not of these data points. I do not know.

 

[sabrom]

Can I quote you?

 

[sabrom]

Well, I don't know anything about Gibsense.

Galaxy structure is your guide? How does that align with non-spiral galaxies?

Pattern recognition, even when not based on tangible factors, is something the human brain is suited for. That is what I see here. The periods and alignments of your model seems to be doing just that, finding a "repeating pattern" against the random backdrop of the galaxy.

Just how I see it from my perspective.

The pattern exists in IUGS and GSofA data, cannot be denied.

 

[sabrom]

The central bar alignments designated by 1± 0.5 ma chills, alternate ±7.7ma (±6.6degree) for the triple IUGS dating Arm sets. That is tangible data. Given observation of distant Galaxies do not have bent arms, thus a perceived symmetrical quandary. The point being a cyclic repetition is not a "random backdrop". This across the Phanerozoic Eon.

Addendum added. This in the computer-generated map, in lieu of a bent arm effect not seen in any galaxies. Now can the presentation be published.

 

[sabrom]

Well, I don't know anything about Gibsense.

Galaxy structure is your guide? How does that align with non-spiral galaxies?

Pattern recognition, even when not based on tangible factors, is something the human brain is suited for. That is what I see here. The periods and alignments of your model seems to be doing just that, finding a "repeating pattern" against the random backdrop of the galaxy.

Just how I see it from my perspective.

Plural Perspective is a critical guide. Given the singular area Carnian Pluvial Episode time dilation, and impossible dual '+/ -' time dilations, amending orbital incongruence with some astronomical measurements, perhaps this is an interrupted comb-like effect. Hypothetically, an elliptical orbiting black hole could cause this at perihelion.
This under continuous WIP, a watch list subject to discovery.
Thank You COLGeek.

 

[sabrom]

Non-spiral galaxy is not of these data points. I do not know.

This is of the 8th interval fundamental spatial equation you query.

This its 6th interval predecessor

PCs hard drive crashes eliminated the fundament versions of one table with 4th, the 6th and 8th are progressions. TG for SRAM and memory sticks. On my 1st (c) excerpt, any table is prohibited copywrite, circa 2000. At this time the best reference available to me (on my hobby budget) was a used N.J.Snelling, The Chronology of the Geologic Record, 1985. At my 10 thousand feet it favored variations in geologic divisions.
My intent is to provide a more understandable pattern in which to frame the meanings of the Geological Record. And although (c) was used, it is to be considered open if I am properly referenced even at the lowest level.

 

[sabrom]

Looking to integrate all this properly. Any time limits as I have some significant health illnesses myself and spouse. Perhaps a week? and thank you COLGeek for your attention suggestions and patience.
--
An integration summary associates N. J. Snelling ground level (tangible data) alternate 'period transitions' argument(s) as associative patterning. Proposed 10,000 foot level pattern [41.5, 37.7,73.4,57.2] +/-7.7) as 209ma Galactic 180 degree doubled to 419.6ma Galactic 360degree associative patterning. That fundamental 209ma pattern does have variations, of which are of variation of IUGS data versus causality.
That as an integration of this discussion's breadth?

 

[COLGeek]

Take your time. No hurry.

 

[sabrom]

Take your time. No hurry.

A significant flaw with [7] Gillman (2008), Galactic Cycle of extinction, and others is error on the direction of Galactic CB Rotation direction. The Oligocene Oi1 ice is 32ma ago, which is clockwise rotation from Earth as viewed from North Galactic Pole. I have notified Svensmark and Shaviv years ago with no response. Now, I need to know how to officially address this.
--
Oh, feeling better, with some home minor maintenance yet to do!

 

[COLGeek]

A significant flaw with [7] Gillman (2008), Galactic Cycle of extinction, and others is error on the direction of Galactic CB Rotation direction. The Oligocene Oi1 ice is 32ma ago, which is clockwise rotation from Earth as viewed from North Galactic Pole. I have notified Svensmark and Shaviv years ago with no response. Now, I need to know how to officially address this.
--
Oh, feeling better, with some home minor maintenance yet to do!

Is it a flaw or just not fitting into your model? How did you prove your assumption?

 

[sabrom]

Is it a flaw or just not fitting into your model? How did you prove your assumption?

What assumption? Gillman's Galactic Rotation? The CB's present Angle? These are published. Assumption is an evidential preponderance; Shaviv claimed deduction of the relative Galactic rotation direction and rate by a self-presumptive statement that Sagittarius Arm SOL intersection was 60ma ago ["The Chilling Stars" CH5 The Dinosaurs' guide to the Galaxy, Swensmark & Calder 2007.] The rate is Ok, direction is not. He does not account for Oi1 Ice, that aligns with a common relative Galactic Rotation rate. Does that answer your query?
--
10Am Eastern Time Zone 4 Dec 2024.

Flaw in due diligence, AKO having data and not recognizing its significance.
--
Bit gift busy until XMAS. Next Year then, upgrading program for this finality.

 

[sabrom]

Is it a flaw or just not fitting into your model? How did you prove your assumption?

The cipher model in adherence to million-years (ma) does not restrict any single 'measurement, of orbital velocity, or periods, or orbital radius except to a clockwise ma defined angular race rate. The tent flaps are wide open here for all peer Galactic propositions. (Such as the best variance for distance to SGR A* as between 23.5 up to 28.7kly.)

 

[sabrom]

(1) The Chilling Stars a Cosmic View of Climate Change, 2007 Icon Books. Shaviv stated the Sagittarius Arm intersected with SOL 60ma ago. Sagittarius is counterclockwise from top dead centered SOL viewed from the NGP. I mapped a Major Perseus Arm intercept as 70ma ago, at the time of broad 9ma 1ma cycling of sea levels [(2) Late Cretaceous sea-level changes in Tunisia...T.Li 2007]. My Perseus Arm overlay presumption was and is based on a unique 1ma -8C step signature found at Oligocene Oi1 and Ordovician GICE, and Carnian Pluvial Episode (CPE). Thirdly the Central Bar is mapped at 22degrees NGP Clockwise from SOL. Separation of OI1 and HICE is 420ma, where CPE is at midway point. ERGO, relative to SOL, the CB complex has a faster rotation rate than SOL by 0.86 degrees/ma. Thus, Sagittarius Arm will pass SOL approximately 60ma from now.
Without official copies of Shaviv's and Gilliman's papers I cannot officially copy anything. However, an author of (2) did copy me their paper, but I have not further confided with this author other than indicate they had mapped the Major Pereus Arm. I claim preponderance of evidence.