Expansion isn't happening with time, Time is happening due to Expansion -True or False?

[Gibsense]

It is widely realised nowadays that the Age of the Universe as a radius translates to our space (as the circumference of a circle) to match the Hubble Constant. That is each second increase in radius (light second) increases space by a close approximation to the measured Hubble Constant. I have always thought of increases in time as causing space expansion but what if it is the other way around; space expansion causes time.
If this were the case, we no longer look for a cause of time (which seems difficult) but for a cause of space expansion (which seems easier). For example, Black Holes may cause white Holes, etc.

What do you think/suggest?

 

[Curiosity killed the cat]

Which came first , the chicken or the egg ? Distance and time are two seemingly separate, intangible, phenomena. They are aso both separations and the two components of motion. However, because time seems to be progression, and that progression is of distance, I have to back time as the driver of the expansion, rather than vice-versa. How these seemingly separate phenomena combined, to form the single phenomenon we call space-time, is currently, and probably always will be beyond comprehension, but it is certainly interesting to think about.

I believe distance and time are fundamental components of reality and as they are intangibles, are exempt from the rules of cause and effect which apply to all things physical.

 

[Catastrophe]

Just asking.

If there were to be a reversal to contraction, would time reverse (whatever that means)?
What would cause what, in this case?

Cat

 

[Curiosity killed the cat]

Just asking.

If there were to be a reversal to contraction, would time reverse (whatever that means)?
What would cause what, in this case?

Cat