Explanation for cosmological red shift of light

Page 2 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.
I have a personal policy of not understanding only one model of the universe at a time and right now I am busy trying to understand conventional physics. Once I get that under my belt, I'll work on alternate theories. For now, I will read alternate physics theories, I will show where they violate conventional physics, but I do not strive to understand them, thus I cannot comment on your questions.
 

Atlan0001

BANNED
Aug 14, 2020
3,423
375
7,060
Now I'm getting angry! The threads do not belong solely to particular posters. Anyone with an idea concerning how a red shift works, such as magnitudes between what is observed (SPACETIME past histories (t=+1)) and what is reality on the spot now (entangled (t=0) REATIME NOW (t=0)), and what is unobserved and unobservable (SPACETIME future histories (t=-1)), can participate in a thread about red shifts! Attacking me personally for participating because you don't understand me or like my views on the subject, including the extended subject...!!!!
 
Last edited:

marcin

You're a madman I've come to the right place, then
Jul 18, 2024
92
10
35
Then we're both getting angry.

You're hijacking the conversation.

How is your binary base related to cosmological redshift?
 
If you are familiar with radio emission, I believe I can show you binary, or digital light. And if not, I can explain it using a spoked wagon wheel.

Fundamental light, i.e., a photon are intermittent and have a duty cycle, not a frequency.

A physical binary. And only the duration of bit zero changes duration when light shifts.

1 is constant and zero varies. Only zero can change.

Hayfield physics.
 
In that case I'm only asking you to take a single look at the other post by the other poster on the other forum
https://physicsdiscussionforum.org/i-have-the-grand-unified-theory-of-physics-t3043.html
Are you able to admit, that SOMETHING is not right with this post?
"Consistent WITH what are E=MC2, TIME dilation, the fourth dimension, AND TIME, gravity/acceleration involves what is BALANCED inertia/inertial resistance; AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky; AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=MA; "

He (or she) loses me at the capitalized second word. It is unclear what the all caps is supposed to mean. I am now confused and I will make no further effort to understand where this guy (or girl) is coming from. Get someone to fix it and then I'll move to the third word. Until then, I'm outta here.
 

marcin

You're a madman I've come to the right place, then
Jul 18, 2024
92
10
35
He (or she) loses me at the capitalized second word. It is unclear what the all caps is supposed to mean. I am now confused and I will make no further effort to understand where this guy (or girl) is coming from. Get someone to fix it and then I'll move to the third word. Until then, I'm outta here.
Thank you, I was only asking for a single glance and your first impression
 
  • Like
Reactions: billslugg

Latest posts