S
SteveMick
Guest
Nuci, I really appreciate your last post. I really do understand the advantages of nuclear power you mentioned and would honestly be delighted to see nuclear used anywhere in space where it is the superior choice based on mass/unit power, cost, and other such considerations. I really just wanted to point out that solar has some remarkable advantages that have not been fully exploited and that have not made their way into conventional wisdom. My optimism is based on the idea that we have a perfectly suitable fusion power plant that is on line continuously and only requires relatively low mass mirrors or lenses to harvest.
Large solar concentrators can function as solar furnaces for refining regolith, power solar thermal rockets( which can use almost anything as propellent but hydrogen is most efficient), produce electricity via concentrator type solar cells, use that to power solar plasma propulsion systems, or double as microwave antennas, radio telescopes or microwave power transmission and receiving antennas. Given that, I think you'll agree that there are likely to be many areas of activity in space for which they'll be the best choice.
Steve
Large solar concentrators can function as solar furnaces for refining regolith, power solar thermal rockets( which can use almost anything as propellent but hydrogen is most efficient), produce electricity via concentrator type solar cells, use that to power solar plasma propulsion systems, or double as microwave antennas, radio telescopes or microwave power transmission and receiving antennas. Given that, I think you'll agree that there are likely to be many areas of activity in space for which they'll be the best choice.
Steve