C
CalliArcale
Guest
<blockquote><font class="small">In reply to:</font><hr /><p>Yeah, my first reaction was Earth, because it is the same location with change occuring in what appears to be ice flows. We haven't stuck around anywhere else long enough to see such changes.<p><hr /></p></p></blockquote><br /><br />Earth is correct! I was hoping to throw people by posting something that wasn't extraterrestrial. <img src="/images/icons/wink.gif" /> But you weren't fooled!<br /><br />The spacecraft RadarSat took these pictures to track the growth of Arctic ice during the winter, a time when visual tracking is useless because there is no sunlight. The mission provided the first comprehensive data on ice thickness across the entire Arctic Ocean.<br /><br />Fun facts about RadarSat (since you all probably know plenty about Earth itself):<br /><br />* RadarSat is a joint mission between the Canadian Space Administration, the Alaskan Synthetic Apeture Radar facility at the University of Fairbanks, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.<br /><br />* Arctic sea ice may be a potent indicator of global environmental conditions; it is only an average of three meters thick, which means it is very sensitive to changes in temperature and flexes a great deal with sea currents beneath it <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p> </p><p><font color="#666699"><em>"People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly wobbly . . . timey wimey . . . stuff."</em> -- The Tenth Doctor, "Blink"</font></p> </div>