No. We get to define “parallel” as lines that includes by implication no intersection.
Calculus easily solves Zeno’s paradox. There is no chance a hare or turtle will not cross the finish line by arguing its distance only approaches it fractionally. Calculus serves to support your argument to dump an infinite series when we already have the answer seen in the asymptote.
Agreed. But we need only understand the context for each use of “infinite”.
Context is not always clear.
For example, on hearing:
Salisbury Plain accident
and
Salisbury plane accident.
For those unfamiliar with UK, Salisbury Plain is a geographical area.
The former refers to an accident on Salisbury Plain (could be auto)
The latter refers to an aeroplane accident near Salisbury.
Cat