Great new UFO Video site

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

nhufohunter

Guest
I have been fortunate enough to have filmed over two hours of UFO sightings in the last two years. Please check out my site<br />http://mysite.verizon.net/vzeomxpk/index.html <br /><br />Just one of the incredible Videos From the Site, The object was Under 1000 ft and within 500 yards of me when I started to film it, It was also completly silent, taken in the middle of the afternoon, and dissapeared into thin air.<br />http://www.jerrypippin.com/video/Franklin%20NH%20Daytime%20footage.WMV<br /><br />http://www.aliensthetruth.com/movies/paul_spera_072904.zip<br /><br />NOTICE THE INSULTS START FLYING ON THE THIRD POST AND DONT EVER END, EVEN WHEN IGNORED<br /><br />THIS IS A TROLL AT WORK, IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT A TROLL IS <br />IT IS SOMEONE WHO HANGS AROUND MESSAGE BOARDS POSTING ANYTHING BUT TOPIC AND ONLY RUDE, INSENSITIVE, UNINTELIGENT CRAP TO TRY AND START SOMETHING,<br />OR IN THIS INSTANCE TO STOP SOMETHING, PEOPLE FROM SEEING THE FOOTAGE<br />NOTICE THE POSTS FROM THE PEOPLE THAT KNOW SOMETHING ABOUT UFOS AND HAVE PROVED IT<br /><br />UNLIKE DGM and his fake friends
 
D

dgm1

Guest
From your site..."the days of the debunker are over..." <br /><br /> Have we now moved into the days of the nutcase? <br /> <br />If you witness such things on such a routine basis have you contacted anyone who might be able to validate your claims. I would think you could get someone objective and reasonable to sit with you in "your backyard" and be a witness to this type of thing. Heck, even local law enforcement would be a good start. Maybe the local news. I mean if you are witnessing attempts at contact it is your duty to mankind to spread the word but instead of a nifty website why not invite CNN or the discovery channel people or 60 minutes to sit in your yard and show us this news? Instead you choose to bear the burden yourself. How thoughtful. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
<font color="yellow">Shaky pictures of stars, satellites and conventional aircraft are not proof of extraterrestrial visitation.</font><br /><br />Obviously, but this statement has very little correlation with the videos on his website. Essentially, his approach is the scientific method in reverse - having dependent variables being observed, but no clear identification of the independent variable (i.e. cause) associated with each event. Certainly, the comprehensive witnesses and disbelieving non-witnesses cannot agree on the intervening variables especially on the matters of aerial anomalies of the unique kind found in his videos.<br /><br />It would be a VERY good idea to put this on a very good UFO documentary on ABC. The problem is making the extraordinary look as though it has some possibility of being true regardless of what anyone thinks. One can never be above the facts, the evidence, and the reality behind what is witnessed.
 
S

skyeagle409

Guest
eburacum---If someone with suitable observational experience were to come and observe your UFO's with you, I have every confidence that your sightings will be explained as well. <br /><br /><br />eburacum,<br /><br />Experts have done just that in this case.<br /><br />http://ufo.cjscreations.com/photos/nellis/<br /><br />http://www.ufocasebook.com/Video/sight4027_nellisufoss.ram<br /><br />eburacum---Shaky pictures of stars, satellites and conventional aircraft are not proof of extraterrestrial visitation. <br /><br />Sky---True, but as you can see from the above links, not all UFO videos consist of "Shaky pictures of stars, satellites and conventional aircraft." <br /><br />
 
S

skyeagle409

Guest
nhufohunter,<br /><br />Nice! I've noticed that you had images of an C-5 Galaxy and KC-135 Stratotanker conducting an aerial refueling operation. One of our KC-10 Extender aircraft was confused and reported as an UFO near Redding, CA. one night as it was flying around with its navigation and formation lights on. <br /><br />
 
D

dgm1

Guest
I don't know about the "great" term used in this thread title. I visited your site and downloaded the vids. Maybe...."Great shaky light footage taken by not-so-great amateur videographer". <br /> I could not see any detail that helped tell me whether i knew what I was seeing or not. there was no reference points to be able to judge motion, speed, size, or any other useful info and I almost got motion sickness watching a few of them. Invest in a tripod or get some one less excited to do your filming. If this is world changing information you are capturing you owe it to the world to do better. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
Actually, if a computer were to analyze a still footage versus this relatively fluid motion of "shaking" seen in his videos, the shaking would give more information to the computer to analyze the footage. Therefore, by shaking the camera in a controlled way, a computer is actually able to know more about the scene that what is otherwise possible.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">I could not see any detail that helped tell me whether i knew what I was seeing or not.</font><br /><br />This is a simple problem of darkness of the background and the limitations of the version of the video available on the web. In terms of quality, the quality of this video is discernably better than most UFO footage.<br /><br />It's quite easy to fake a UFO with a tripod. However that is irrelevent because we already have enough information to know that these are genuine UFO sightings.
 
N

nhufohunter

Guest
If you watch all of the videos and READ the information youd see that I already have scientists backing my findings to the point of a press release from a planetarium calling for a study of this phenomenon based on the hard evidence that I have and am still <br />provided, they plan to visit often to try and get some of their own images but mostly just want to see them<br />I have more than enough evidence that these that most of the film I have taken is of ET craft and not satellites or planes. One of the scientists is also a pilot and aeronautics expert.<br /><br />Another thing, The Mexico footae was over fifteen minutes long and there is no way that those objects would have been in the frame for that long, the plane was at 10000 ft if not higher, as far I'm concerned this is nothing more than a lame debunking effort that is not very convincing<br /><br />Then there is the Nelis footage that has NEVER been explained. Anaylisis clearly shows a four segment, structured craft that not only moved in 90 degree turns but also rotated while doing this. The enhanced, stabilized and centered images where shown on the show Sightings and have been under lock and key since. <br />An actuall UFO entusiast or even skeptic that had any inteligent knowledge of the situation would know this information<br /><br />NECN couldnt' debunk my footge nor can you<br /><br />Thank you to those who actually looked at the evedince and have seen it for what it is. Now please spread it and don't let these know-nothing brain washed skeptics and debunkers deture. I have evidence that will and has shut them up.<br /> <br />I have already been on the front page of the newspaper, Pimetime News, and multiple radio shows including Whitley Strieber's Unknow country, see my site for all of the articles and interviews<br /><br />None of the mainstream media could show some of the more interesting videos because they where too good<br /><br />watch the July 2nd video and the November 13th
 
N

nhufohunter

Guest
First of all setting up a tripod is not the answer, it's a mono pod and even that is sometimes difficult to use<br />These objects can move very fast, can materalize from nowhere and dissapear just as fast, if I took the time to set up a tripod none of this footage would exsist.<br />If you are concened and willing to help mankind then why not help by sending a dontation for good camera epuipment or send a better camera, they start at 5000 bucks and the one that would be the most effective starts at 50k<br />I'm just a musician and experiencer and has done this on my own, spent my own money to bring this to people along with the help of some researchers and UFO sites that host the videos<br /><br />Remember that your looking at a 1 and a half inch video screen with images that have been degraded by encoding them and edited for time to make it possible to be shown on the web. Imagine what this looks like on a HDTV<br />
 
S

skyeagle409

Guest
nhufohunter---NECN couldnt' debunk my footge nor can you <br /><br /><br />nhufohunter,<br /><br />I am not dubunking the footage, I was just commenting on the two aircraft depicted in one of the images.<br /><br /><br /><br />
 
N

nhufohunter

Guest
sorry, that wasn't ment for you<br /><br />It was meant for the debunker want to bees
 
N

nhufohunter

Guest
dgm,<br />you know it's people like you that sit around all day and try stir &%$#@! up by posting on message boards that <br />are really doing their part for mankind<br /><br />You call the media and see how far you get,<br /><br /> or how about reading some of the information on the site and finding out that I have already contacted the media, and scientists and anybody and everbody I could find that can help spread this news or maybe bring this to someones attention<br /><br />If you knew anything you'd know that the media is not allowed to do a real story on this and why<br /><br />why don't you help spread the news instead of wasting your time posting things you have no clue about
 
D

dgm1

Guest
Nhufohunter, <br /> My friends dad was president of the NE ohio ufo research club (or whatever it was called) for the entire time I went to school with his son. They investigated every blinking light, shooting star, patch of burnt ground, barking dog and low flying plane they could get info on. He was rabid about it and so were all of his members. After all that time, nearly thirty years, he concluded that everything had an earthly explanation. I believe he was right. <br /> Now you come along and think you have found proof of alien visitation. You filmed over fifty episodes in one year right? That is almost once a week but regardless of the frequency it still puts you in the "fortunate" bracket as far as evidence goes. So why do you only get local station interest? MIT, NASA, CIA, CNN, and other acronyms should be highly interested. If your planetarium guy had any credibility or confidence he would be getting the right people to come to you. If you filmed them in your back yard it would not be too difficult to be in the right place...all you need then is the right time. And at 50 sightings in a year the right time seems like it would also take care of itself. Surely some one with the right background, experience and, most importantly, the right<br />equipment (like a 50k vidcam) would be willing to camp out in your yard and await the next few occurences. Wouldn't you think this would be the case.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">If you knew anything you'd know that the media is not allowed to do a real story on this and why</font><br /><br /> I thought I knew a few things but I do not know why the media can't do this story. Is it govenrnment control? A church threat? Weekly world news, and National Enquirer do these stories.Aren't they afraid? Maybe it is because the media is concerned with their credibility and know that your shaky vids will only bring them laughter and kook calls. Without real evidence why would they risk their credibility by showing yet <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
N

nhufohunter

Guest
NASA couldn't figure out what it is but you can, your bogus ,<br /> the focus was set to infinity so it could not go out of focus, the object was within 300 yards of me and silent, oh and the end of the tape it dissapears in split second,<br />how do planes do that?
 
N

nhufohunter

Guest
You my not know it but you have proved that what I am doing is filming UFOs and they are most likely ET.<br /><br />The major networks will not touch this, You need to figure out why on your own<br /><br />The govenment will not come out with the truth and need to find out why on your own<br /><br />You are just a slave like everyone else yet it seems you are happy with that, <br /><br />If you don't think what I have done is the real thing then don't go to my site, you can say whatever you want, it's not going to change the fact that we have been visited for thousands of years and the education process is speeding up,<br /><br />don't worry, You'll still have you meaningless life to live, the truth wont come out untill they thin the herd and by then you'll be dust<br /><br />nothing you have said changes the FACTs that I have top noch scientists and the support of tens of thousands of people supporting the fact that these are UFOs and are here to stay <br /><br />and I might add that the footage is far from shaky, there are some of the best UFO videos ever taken, triangles, BOLs, Saucers, and that is what other people are saying, <br />for you people that have botherd to read, whatever his fake name is, Don't let him deture you, he is lieing, there is AMAZING UNDENIABLE EVEDINCE, that is completely free, there are alot of people that don't want this to come out and they will do and say anything, and I mean anything to stop it.<br />Watch the footage and decide for your self<br /><br />And by the way, Anybody can do what I'm doing and I urge more people to do that. Keep your cameras handy and if you don't have one get one! We need more people to come forward and face the ridicule that has been etched into societys walls and break the leash. Look at things, it's so obvious that it is sickening but we can stop it. <br /><br />All we have to is keep looking up.<br /><br />or we can fight and murder innocent people over oil that is going to be goon in 50 years, if we make it that long
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
Skepticism over the facts is silly <img src="/images/icons/tongue.gif" />
 
D

dgm1

Guest
Now we are getting somewhere. I knew if I just pissed you off enough the real story would emerge. <br /> You began experiencing paranormal activity since the age of four. Not just UFO's but also hauntings. Why not bigfoot also? <br /> You are desperately wanting to be seen as <b>special</b>. In your eyes you already are. You want others to see you this way also. If they don't it is the usual reasons ; "you refuse to see", "you are brainwashed.", "you are being lied to but I have discovered the truth" and "you are slaves". Uh-huh! Take the blue pill and forget...or take the red one and....We've all seen it before. Let's just look at your last post for evidence of your "delusions of grandeur" thing.<br /> <br /><font color="yellow">You my not know it but you have proved that what I am doing is filming UFOs and they are most likely ET.</font><br /><br /> I am not even sure of what you are saying in this part but I assure you I have not proven anything either for or against your claims. I am dissecting your psyche more than anything. Your UFO evidence is laughable for the most part and is not really what you are about. It is the feeling of <b>specialness</b> you seek to satisfy and the uniqueness of being a UFO witness is the drug of choice to do so. Anything you film that is odd will help you reinforce this feeling.<br /><br /> <font color="yellow">The major networks will not touch this, You need to figure out why on your own </font><br /><br /> Another claim to make your knowledge that much more <b>special</b>. And I must find out on my own? Why? If you know and have such persuasive evidence for it why not tell me? I know why. It is not true. But you lose some of the <b>specialness</b> if there is not a big plot to deny us lemmings the info you have been granted. <br /><br /><font color="yellow">The govenment will not come out with the truth and need to find out why on your own</font><br /> This is more of the above. What could possibly squelch <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
K

kmarinas86

Guest
<font color="yellow">There it is. Now I see why it is important for you to hold onto these jumpy, out-of-focus videos and defend your claims about them.</font><br /><br />LOL <img src="/images/icons/tongue.gif" /> my ability to see that the UFO hues are not changed by the blurriness is not halted by the fact that I wear corrective lenses.<br /><br />It's possible that the grandeur is real by the way.<br /><br /><font color="yellow">Of course you have proof of this I am sure - some mysterious artwork, ambigious writings and that sort of thing.</font><br /><br />LOL LOL LOL skepticism of the facts! <img src="/images/icons/tongue.gif" />
 
D

dgm1

Guest
<font color="yellow">LOL LOL LOL skepticism of the facts!</font><br /><br /> Not so. Skepticism of the interpretation. <br /><br /> Now leave the adults alone for a while. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
N

nhufohunter

Guest
Looks like I hit a nerve<br /><br />/* ad hominems deleted */
 
F

fear

Guest
Lol, I'm pretty sure the mods are going to edit that one. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>
 
P

pizzaguy

Guest
They shouldn't bother: dgm1 won't go crying about it, attacks like that show us who is on firm ground, and who isnt'. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <font size="1"><em>Note to Dr. Henry:  The testosterone shots are working!</em></font> </div>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom