3
3488
Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'> <font color="#ff0000">That is correct, the original article that it sprang from in 2003 was quite accurate. I may even have it (or a link to it) here somewhere. When it rose from the dead, in 2004, the telescope part was gone and it was the crap that floats around every year now. <br />Posted by MeteorWayne</font></DIV></p><p><font size="2" color="#000000"><strong>I totally agree MeteorWayne. I too get fed up with this crap every August now. No doubt this August, it will rear its ugly head again.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2" color="#000000"><strong>Andrew Brown.</strong></font></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080">"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before".</font> <em><strong><font color="#000000">Linda Morabito </font></strong><font color="#800000">on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.</font></em></p><p><font size="1" color="#000080">http://www.launchphotography.com/</font><br /><br /><font size="1" color="#000080">http://anthmartian.googlepages.com/thisislandearth</font></p><p><font size="1" color="#000080">http://web.me.com/meridianijournal</font></p> </div>