Is Conserved Light the Impetus of Spatial Bodies ?

[Thermoman]

Newton said a body in motion will remain in motion unless acted upon by an external force . This applying to spatial bodies and orbits . So ok , all good Mr Newton but why ?


What is the impetus , the force that makes something move , in your statement?

Well I have thought long and hard on this and concluded the impetus of spatial bodies is conserved light . The conserved light of the body attracted to the vector ahead of it because the Eigen Vector is in a lower energy state than the spatial body .


I have discounted the electrodynamics of moving bodies because space has zero conductive/attractive force in regards to elementary charge . However , we know light is attracted to lower Eigenstates.

Thanks for reading ,comments welcome!

 

[Thermoman]

Light is forcefully pulled through space by Gravity-B so any matter that conserves light is also going to have an applied force of Gravity-B acting on it !

When a spatial body conserves light , the light has inertia relative to the body but the body has no inertia relative to its position in space . The light that is conserved is pulled by Gravity-B which in turn moves the body .

So if you pushed an object into space , it will carry on moving because the conserved light is attracted to the space ahead .

The charge of a body does not act or is affected by space , the charge is dependent to the body .

 

[Thermoman]

Here is a visual of the process .

I tie a rope to your waste and you hold on tight to a Bicycle . I pull the rope and you are pulled along but because of your inertia on the Bike , the Bike moves with you . Not once did I apply direct force on the bike .