Jupiter 120 and Ares V (for Lunar Missions)

[kyle_baron]

<p><strong>What's wrong with this scenario, if Ares 1 falls flat?&nbsp; Over at NSF.com, &nbsp;this guy really understands the problem:</strong></p><table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" width="100%" style="table-layout:fixed"><tbody><tr><td width="16%" valign="top"><strong>tankmodeler</strong> <div id="msg_349436_extra_info" class="smalltext">Regular<br />Full Member<br /><img src="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/Themes/nsf/images/star.gif" border="0" alt="*" /><img src="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/Themes/nsf/images/star.gif" border="0" alt="*" /><img src="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/Themes/nsf/images/star.gif" border="0" alt="*" /><img src="http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/Themes/nsf/images/star.gif" border="0" alt="*" /><br />Offline<br /><br />Posts: 442<br />Location: Brampton, ON, Canada<br /><br /><br /></div>

 

[trailrider]

<p>This would certainly seem to be a potentially viable option...IF...Obama goes along with it, AND IF...Congress provides the money.&nbsp; At this point, no telling what will happen after January 20th.</p><p>Ad LEO! Ad Luna! Ad Ares! Ad Astra!</p>