J
JonClarke
Guest
<p>The latest Scientific American (June) has an article on lake Cheko in Siberia as a possible crater formed by the Tunguska exploration. It is a good summary of the evidence and counter to the arguments against an impact origin. The area is very remote logicistically and the Russian military allowed them to use a Mil 26 helicopter to take the heavy equipment in and out. Few logistic problems in field work are intractable when you have a Mil 26!</p><p>Lake Cheko is morphologically similar to impact craters and dissimilar to other lakes in the area. </p><p>It is within the devasted area and on the flight line of the impactor. The crater is elongated parallel to the flight line. </p><p>The sediment layer in the lake is very thin and contains abundant wood debris destroyed by the impact.</p><p>Trees along the lake sure have grown asymmetrically indicating sudden reomoval of forest along the lake side.</p><p>There is no indication in maps or oral tradition of the lake existing before Tunguska.</p><p>Interestingly, in almost the exact centre of the lake and the deepest part, there is a buried high density magnetic object about 1 m across. The authors expect to return to Lake Cheko later this year and drill the feature. Presumably the Mil 26 will come in useful one again.</p><p>Jon</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Whether we become a multi-planet species with unlimited horizons, or are forever confined to Earth will be decided in the twenty-first century amid the vast plains, rugged canyons and lofty mountains of Mars</em> Arthur Clarke</p> </div>