Leptons: The elementary particles explained

I note this from the article.

"This decay reaction demonstrates a couple of the fundamental properties of leptons. First of all, it conserves a property known as the Lepton Number, which is defined by physicists at Georgia State University(opens in new tab) as the number of leptons minus the number of anti-leptons. A neutron is a baryon, not a lepton, so its Lepton Number is 0. Therefore its decay products must also add up to a Lepton Number of 0. The Lepton Number of an electron is 1, and the Lepton Number of an anti-neutrino is –1, hence they cancel and conserve the overall Lepton Number of the reaction."

It would be good to show in the BB model, when did the leptons appear.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/09/220908172401.htm, "Summary: Early in its history, shortly after the Big Bang, the universe was filled with equal amounts of matter and 'antimatter' -- particles that are matter counterparts but with opposite charge. But then, as space expanded, the universe cooled. Today's universe is full of galaxies and stars which are made of matter. Where did the antimatter go, and how did matter come to dominate the universe? This cosmic origin of matter continues to puzzle scientists..."
 
  • Like
Reactions: billslugg
Dec 29, 2022
64
5
35
The quantum steps of the electron and proton are the same steps. Normally the electron occupies the low steps. The proton is at home in the high states. However these personalities can be inverted. An electron can be charged up to the high energy proton state, and the proton can be relaxed to the electron state.

Science calls it antimatter. It's inverted matter. And that's why you don't see much of it. Antimatter is regular matter.

Electrons and protons have the same rotational quantum RPMs. Spectrums. Because they have the same structure.

The classic theory of mass. And the classic explanation of the periodic table.
 
Dec 29, 2022
64
5
35
Matter....mass...and inertia are distinct concepts. There are related, but not the same thing. Mass and inertia are properties of matter. There is only one form of matter, our science calls it charge. But know little about it. -e and +e is the only matter, the only physical entity in this cosmos. You may think of it as a set number of E field lines, or a specific density at a certain size. One may also consider it to be a constant length. However you happen to think of an E field.

The area of space that this constant occupies, can be varied. THAT area, gives us the property of mass. When we squeeze or stretch that area......we change the mass of the matter. The matter remains constant and when we vary the density of that matter it is called mass. Mass is adjustable, matter is not. Inertia is the force necessary to accelerate mass. If mass is stationary, it takes a certain force to accelerate it. If the mass is moving with momentum, it will take more acceleration to change it. So it will have more inertia. Inertia depends on the motion of mass.

Matter is a constant amount, mass is the density of matter, and inertia is the acceleration needed to change that motion of mass.

Where does the motion come from? Why does matter move? Why and How does matter move?

All -e and all +e have an internal electrical pressure which is powered by the self-repulsiveness of the e itself. e is always trying to explode out into space. e hates itself. It's trying to super nova. At c.

This outward c acceleration of e, generates a common M field, because of the common outward e direction. This M field rolls and turns the little bits of e. The outward V of e, has been turned into a rotation of e at c. This expanding super nova has turned and rotated to a certain size. This happens at c. At c, M = E. And the charge spins, a self powered spin. By the conversion of linear V to angular V.

This rotation has TWO spins, not one. The E is rotating and the M is rotating. In the right handed e(+e), the M and the E are rotating in the same direction. In this configuration, the mass adds, because the E and the M momentums are moving in the same direction. You will measure and experience high mass.

In the left handed e(-e), the E and M are in opposite directions. The mass subtracts. The mass you measure is the difference in the directions......and measures very light. Almost no mass. But that is only apparent. Because the momentum is in opposition.

Giving the left e an empty personality. Light and no energy or mass.

And giving the right e, a full personality, heavy and lots of energy and mass.

Two personalities with the same amount of matter.

Physicality is much simpler than the standard model.
 
Matter....mass...and inertia are distinct concepts. There are related, but not the same thing. Mass and inertia are properties of matter. There is only one form of matter, our science calls it charge. But know little about it. -e and +e is the only matter, the only physical entity in this cosmos. You may think of it as a set number of E field lines, or a specific density at a certain size. One may also consider it to be a constant length. However you happen to think of an E field.

The area of space that this constant occupies, can be varied. THAT area, gives us the property of mass. When we squeeze or stretch that area......we change the mass of the matter. The matter remains constant and when we vary the density of that matter it is called mass. Mass is adjustable, matter is not. Inertia is the force necessary to accelerate mass. If mass is stationary, it takes a certain force to accelerate it. If the mass is moving with momentum, it will take more acceleration to change it. So it will have more inertia. Inertia depends on the motion of mass.

Matter is a constant amount, mass is the density of matter, and inertia is the acceleration needed to change that motion of mass.

Where does the motion come from? Why does matter move? Why and How does matter move?

All -e and all +e have an internal electrical pressure which is powered by the self-repulsiveness of the e itself. e is always trying to explode out into space. e hates itself. It's trying to super nova. At c.

This outward c acceleration of e, generates a common M field, because of the common outward e direction. This M field rolls and turns the little bits of e. The outward V of e, has been turned into a rotation of e at c. This expanding super nova has turned and rotated to a certain size. This happens at c. At c, M = E. And the charge spins, a self powered spin. By the conversion of linear V to angular V.

This rotation has TWO spins, not one. The E is rotating and the M is rotating. In the right handed e(+e), the M and the E are rotating in the same direction. In this configuration, the mass adds, because the E and the M momentums are moving in the same direction. You will measure and experience high mass.

In the left handed e(-e), the E and M are in opposite directions. The mass subtracts. The mass you measure is the difference in the directions......and measures very light. Almost no mass. But that is only apparent. Because the momentum is in opposition.

Giving the left e an empty personality. Light and no energy or mass.

And giving the right e, a full personality, heavy and lots of energy and mass.

Two personalities with the same amount of matter.

Physicality is much simpler than the standard model.
"Physicality is much simpler than the standard model."

So, does this new model (at least new to me) replace the standard model in use in physics today?
 
Dec 29, 2022
64
5
35
This model is an updated model of the Parson's Magneton. It was studied and updated by a group of scientists that tried to corral plasma in a bowl. And the Standard Model and QM failed them. And still does. We still can't stir plasma in a pot.

This updated model explained why they can not stir that pot. I have read that it was simulated and resulted in more accurate results than the standard model. It even predicted new spectrums and nuclei. Which were confirmed in the lab. And explained the source known atomic spectrums.

The first model came out before the neutron was known. And if you look at the structure, it's easy to see why a neutron is needed. AND how a neutron is made.

I have used this model to explain all dynamics I can think of for the last 8 years. And it has never failed me.

-e and + e is all that is needed for the periodic table and this universe.

Will it replace the standard model? I doubt it. This has no magic. It's straight electro-mechanical concepts. A 16 yr. old can understand it.

Edit: This model predicts and physically explains the periodic table much more accurately than the standard model.
 
Last edited:
Dec 29, 2022
64
5
35
What's neat about this model is that it explains the recently witnessed quick contraction of matter in fusion ignitions. This predicted property and dynamic was un-reconized for many decades. But this is the physical dynamic that explains the so called "quantum effect". This model explains how all the varied ratios, of the particle's properties, change, with a physical cause.

But not realized yet......is that this also is the mechanism for emission from monopole emitters.

And will lead to the true understanding of the dynamics, of dipole emission.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY

Latest posts