Light in the existence

[Nick-C]

Defining Light:

Instead of viewing light as a particle or wave that travels through space, consider it as a stationary medium that exists as the foundational layer of reality. I suggest that light is always present and interacts with matter rather than moving through space.

 

[stanwaterman]

Defining Light:

Instead of viewing light as a particle or wave that travels through space, consider it as a stationary medium that exists as the foundational layer of reality. I suggest that light is always present and interacts with matter rather than moving through space.

Are you including all EM radiation from gamma rays through ultra violet, visible light, infra red, then radio waves? The mixture clearly varies tremendously from the centre of galaxies to intergalactic space. How does your scheme account for the numerous, and increasingly precise, measurements of the speed of light?

 

[Nick-C]

Thank you for your insightful question! Yes, my hypothesis does indeed encompass all forms of electromagnetic (EM) radiation, including gamma rays, ultraviolet, visible light, infrared, and radio waves and that light acts as a stationary platform suggests that all forms of EM radiation coexist within this medium.

 

[Nick-C]

Regarding the precise measurements of the speed of light, my proposal reframes the discussion. The speed of light is defined as a constant in a vacuum, but if we consider light as a stationary medium, this does not negate the established measurements. Instead, it invites exploration into how our understanding of "speed" might evolve when viewed through the lens of light as a foundational element.

 

[COLGeek]

To summarize, you propose that light is a static lattice/framework that everything exists and moves within?

What led you to this theory?

 

[billslugg]

No EM wave exists without a moving charge somewhere. EM cannot exist in a static framework. If light was stationary and we were moving, our bodies would be torn apart by the very fast movement.

 

[Nick-C]

To summarize, you propose that light is a static lattice/framework that everything exists and moves within?

What led you to this theory?

Thank you for your question! Yes, you’ve captured the essence of my hypothesis accurately. I propose that light acts as a static framework or lattice upon which all particles and objects exist and move

1. By viewing light as a stationary platform, I suggest that it provides a consistent foundation for the universe. This perspective allows us to rethink our understanding of motion and interaction, as everything else moves relative to this fixed light layer.

2. : As particles and objects move within this framework, they create disturbances in the light layer. These disturbances may manifest as various observable phenomena, influencing how we perceive light and its properties.

3. : This model not only redefines how we think about light but also offers potential insights into gravitational effects and the nature of dark matter. It invites a more interconnected view of the universe, where light and matter exist in dynamic relation.

I appreciate your engagement with my hypothesis and welcome any further questions or insights!

 

[COLGeek]

What AI/LLM are you using to refine your hypothesis?

 

[Classical Motion]

Then why does it get dark every night?

 

[Nick-C]

What AI/LLM are you using to refine your hypothesis?

OpenAI chatGPT, as assisted discussion

 

[COLGeek]

Just keep in mind LLM limitations and shortcomings. Not true AI, more of an advanced search capability.