Light in the existence

Jun 11, 2025
6
0
10
Defining Light:

Instead of viewing light as a particle or wave that travels through space, consider it as a stationary medium that exists as the foundational layer of reality. I suggest that light is always present and interacts with matter rather than moving through space.
 
Apr 23, 2024
43
13
535
Defining Light:

Instead of viewing light as a particle or wave that travels through space, consider it as a stationary medium that exists as the foundational layer of reality. I suggest that light is always present and interacts with matter rather than moving through space.
Are you including all EM radiation from gamma rays through ultra violet, visible light, infra red, then radio waves? The mixture clearly varies tremendously from the centre of galaxies to intergalactic space. How does your scheme account for the numerous, and increasingly precise, measurements of the speed of light?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Catastrophe
Jun 11, 2025
6
0
10
Thank you for your insightful question! Yes, my hypothesis does indeed encompass all forms of electromagnetic (EM) radiation, including gamma rays, ultraviolet, visible light, infrared, and radio waves and that light acts as a stationary platform suggests that all forms of EM radiation coexist within this medium.
 
Jun 11, 2025
6
0
10
Regarding the precise measurements of the speed of light, my proposal reframes the discussion. The speed of light is defined as a constant in a vacuum, but if we consider light as a stationary medium, this does not negate the established measurements. Instead, it invites exploration into how our understanding of "speed" might evolve when viewed through the lens of light as a foundational element.
 
Jun 11, 2025
6
0
10
To summarize, you propose that light is a static lattice/framework that everything exists and moves within?

What led you to this theory?

Thank you for your question! Yes, you’ve captured the essence of my hypothesis accurately. I propose that light acts as a static framework or lattice upon which all particles and objects exist and move

1. By viewing light as a stationary platform, I suggest that it provides a consistent foundation for the universe. This perspective allows us to rethink our understanding of motion and interaction, as everything else moves relative to this fixed light layer.

2. : As particles and objects move within this framework, they create disturbances in the light layer. These disturbances may manifest as various observable phenomena, influencing how we perceive light and its properties.

3. : This model not only redefines how we think about light but also offers potential insights into gravitational effects and the nature of dark matter. It invites a more interconnected view of the universe, where light and matter exist in dynamic relation.

I appreciate your engagement with my hypothesis and welcome any further questions or insights!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jun 11, 2025
6
0
10
Schrödinger's cat now has a flashlight; is it on?
I appreciate the humor and thank you for your thought-provoking comment.
The idea of whether the flashlight is "on" can be likened to the question of whether the cat is alive or dead until observed
If consider light as a foundational medium, the act of observing or interacting with it (like turning on the flashlight) could represent a disturbance in the light layer.
 
Jan 2, 2024
1,174
186
1,360
If consider light as a foundational medium, the act of observing or interacting with it (like turning on the flashlight) could represent a disturbance in the light layer.
A photon (or any massless particle travelling at light speed) follows a path through spacetime along which the proper time is zero. We could consider Cosmic time as the null geodesic for light. That is zero.
In a sense maybe we can consider that light already exists along its full path(s) into the future and that its apparent speed arises when we 'arrive' (in time) to where the light photon exists.

I referred to an AI and combined the ideas with my thoughts re hyperspheres and this is the returned statement:

Your conceptual model captures an intriguing way of visualizing cosmic expansion and light's trajectory. In the hypersphere analogy, where cosmic time is represented as the radial direction and the 3D universe forms the surface, every point in space participates in the expansion much like points on an inflating balloon. In this picture, a photon's worldline—when depicted in a spacetime diagram using units that set the speed of light ( c = 1 )—appears as a 45-degree line relative to the temporal (radial) direction. This is because, conventionally in such diagrams, light's trajectory is always set at 45 degrees to preserve the invariant nature of ( c ).


Here's how your view fits together:


  1. Cosmic Expansion as a Radial Process:
    In your model, the radius of the hypersphere corresponds to cosmic time. As the universe expands, this radius increases uniformly, representing the passage of time. This is analogous to how, for every observer, the cosmic time ticks forward as space expands.
  2. Light's 45-Degree Path:
    When you combine the expanding cosmic time with the idea of light following a null geodesic, its path in a spacetime diagram appears at 45 degrees relative to the time axis. This relationship is a reflection of how the speed of light remains constant locally, despite the overall expansion of the universe.
  3. Stationary Nature in a Timeless Sense:
    Since a photon accumulates zero proper time along its journey (its experience is "timeless"), you can think of its entire path as already fixed in the spacetime manifold. The 45-degree direction becomes a way to represent this "extended existence" within the dynamic yet geometrically constrained picture of the hypersphere. Essentially, while every point in space is moving outward with the passage of cosmic time, the photon’s journey through spacetime—its null geodesic—is laid out at this invariant angle, making it appear as if it is “stationary” in its own frame.
  4. Interpreting the 360-Degree Expansion:
    The notion of 360-degree expansion emphasizes that the expansion is uniform in all spatial directions. When we view this from the hyperspherical surface, the light's path, being a null geodesic, naturally cuts across the expanding fabric at that fixed slope (45 degrees). This is a conceptual way of merging the local invariance of the speed of light with the global dynamics of cosmic expansion.

Your idea does make sense as a conceptual tool. It elegantly combines the idea that while space expands uniformly (much like points on a balloon moving apart), light's trajectory remains defined by the geometry of spacetime itself—a geometry in which light’s path is always at a 45-degree angle. This helps reconcile the idea that, although light is moving (from our everyday 3D perspective), from its own "perspective" (abstract as that may be) it is, in a sense, stationary along its null geodesic.


This framing can serve as a springboard to explore further ideas about how cosmic expansion and local physics interplay, or to dive deeper into concepts like the block universe and conformal diagrams in cosmology.

Me : so yes, I agree that light could be considered stationary and as existing along its whole length to the point of interaction and from its origin. This does mean the future exists already but that does not mean that the future cannot change. Clearly for the future to change an additional interacting force is needed - but that's another story.

Just a thought or two. It fits maybe
 
EM radiation is an intermittent saw-tooth waveform with a duty cycle of 50%. An intermittent EM field acceleration ramp.

Emitter motion shifts the ratio of that waveform. Detector motion shifts the rate of that waveform.

Two shifts in one.

Hayseed physics.

No AI was used or harmed during this comment.
 
Jan 2, 2024
1,174
186
1,360
EM radiation is an intermittent saw-tooth waveform with a duty cycle of 50%. An intermittent EM field acceleration ramp.

Emitter motion shifts the ratio of that waveform. Detector motion shifts the rate of that waveform.


Two shifts in one.
Hayseed physics.

No AI was used or harmed during this comment.
Ha ha! Ref AI. Response is for amusement only there is no input from me
So I asked an AI what it thought of the post and it said:
That comment is… certainly colourful. But from a physics standpoint, it’s a bit of a conceptual jumble.

Electromagnetic (EM) radiation is typically described as a continuous oscillating wave—often sinusoidal in nature—not a sawtooth waveform. Sawtooth waves can be used in signal processing or electronics, but they’re not a standard representation of natural EM radiation like light or radio waves. Also, the idea of a “50% duty cycle” applies more to pulse or square waves, not to continuous EM waves.

The part about “emitter motion” and “detector motion” affecting the waveform seems to be referencing the Doppler effect, which is a real and well-understood phenomenon. But calling it “two shifts in one” is a bit vague and doesn’t clarify much.

And “intermittent EM field acceleration ramp”? That’s not standard terminology in physics. It sounds like someone trying to describe complex phenomena with poetic flair—but without much scientific rigour.


So yes, John, calling it “hayseed physics” might be the most accurate part of the whole thing. Want to unpack any part of it further or rewrite it into something that actually makes sense?

Me: No human was consulted or harmed in this response. However, I got a shock when it knew my name !!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Classical Motion
If only the emitter moves, you get a shift. If only the detector moves, you get a different kind of shift. If both are moving you get a combination of those shifts.

The acceleration ramp is how energy is transferred to matter from radiation.
 
Jan 2, 2024
1,174
186
1,360
No EM wave exists without a moving charge somewhere. EM cannot exist in a static framework. If light was stationary and we were moving, our bodies would be torn apart by the very fast movement.
But, if it already exists far into the future, and after travelling some distance and letting time pass, we engage it then we would think it had speed because it was encountered over a distance and in our time. It did not move. It was stationary but the now instant that we experience recombined further on in space with the expansion of the universe in time. Or, something like that :):rolleyes:
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts