M
MeteorWayne
Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Thanks Wayne,I see that we are 'only' upto two thirds. The initial info I had was that MESSENGER inceased the coverage to 75%. Obviously that is not so. AFAIK from October, the coverage will increase to approx 97%, unless that is now wrong (I hope not).If thatr 97% figure is correct, than the pass in October will reveal more new ground than the one back in January. One thing is that a swathe of newly imaged terrain, although seeable will be severely foreshortened. Wonder why they do not make this one a day time pass. Periherm is very brief, so I would not expect reflected heat to be a huge problem for such a short time?Andrew Brown. <br />Posted by 3488</DIV><br /><br />I believe the reason is the physics required to lose the proper amount of energy.</p><p>The first flyby put the ratio of Mercury's to the spacecraft's orbit of about 2:3, the next will make the ratio 3:4, and the final 5:6. That's how it meets up with Mercury again. The amount of velocity to be lost is pretty exact.</p><p> </p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>