Everyone knows and understands how a cue ball and an eight ball behaves. That’s neutral inertial exchange of acceleration.
The behavior depends on the relative size of the balls. Velocity and angle.
When accelerating a charge, this behavior depends on the density of the accelerating field, and the interaction area of the charge that is being accelerated.
Imagine an eight ball being accelerated, and instead of that force being applied to direction, a portion of it was applied to making the eight ball spin, and not go to linear acceleration. And then imagine that as the eight ball spins, it shrinks, and now it has reduced it’s target area for the acceleration.
So some acceleration energy was converted to shrinkage spin. Requiring more acceleration for the same amount of velocity increase. The rate of spin and temperature gain, depends on the rate of acceleration. If you stop the acceleration before a quantum step is reached, the particle will swell back to previous size. If you lock it into another quantum size and then stop acceleration, the particle will keep small and hot. It’s like a ratchet spring.
A constant acceleration will keep shrinking and spinning the particle faster. At a certain smallest limit, ALL of the acceleration will be turn into spin, AND that spin will be emitted to keep that smallest size.
It can no longer gain mass or inertia. And cast off all the energy imparted to it.
I believe the proper rate of duty cycle acceleration can take charge to c easily.Without mass gain. But no faster.
Matter can only be shrunk and can never superposition. CERN proves this with every switch.
CERN can only fragment matter. And then it dissolves.
Only EM and G “fields”, (whatever they are) can superposition. Quirks are just dissolving fragments. Not charge components. There are no charge components. Charge is discreet. Quantum, of itself, innate and singular. The only physicality there is.
The cosmos and the periodic table only has two ingredients.
It’s just a supposition.
The behavior depends on the relative size of the balls. Velocity and angle.
When accelerating a charge, this behavior depends on the density of the accelerating field, and the interaction area of the charge that is being accelerated.
Imagine an eight ball being accelerated, and instead of that force being applied to direction, a portion of it was applied to making the eight ball spin, and not go to linear acceleration. And then imagine that as the eight ball spins, it shrinks, and now it has reduced it’s target area for the acceleration.
So some acceleration energy was converted to shrinkage spin. Requiring more acceleration for the same amount of velocity increase. The rate of spin and temperature gain, depends on the rate of acceleration. If you stop the acceleration before a quantum step is reached, the particle will swell back to previous size. If you lock it into another quantum size and then stop acceleration, the particle will keep small and hot. It’s like a ratchet spring.
A constant acceleration will keep shrinking and spinning the particle faster. At a certain smallest limit, ALL of the acceleration will be turn into spin, AND that spin will be emitted to keep that smallest size.
It can no longer gain mass or inertia. And cast off all the energy imparted to it.
I believe the proper rate of duty cycle acceleration can take charge to c easily.Without mass gain. But no faster.
Matter can only be shrunk and can never superposition. CERN proves this with every switch.
CERN can only fragment matter. And then it dissolves.
Only EM and G “fields”, (whatever they are) can superposition. Quirks are just dissolving fragments. Not charge components. There are no charge components. Charge is discreet. Quantum, of itself, innate and singular. The only physicality there is.
The cosmos and the periodic table only has two ingredients.
It’s just a supposition.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram