<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>Perhaps I'm jus' dense but ... if space is virtually a vacuum why show objects, such as asteroids, tumbling? <br /> Posted by zarnic</DIV></p><p>Aerodynamic forces don't play much of a role out in space where the medium is insignificant. Any spin and/or tumbling are imparted on object through other means.</p><p>Conservation of angular momentum is a major player for large objects that have spin such as the sun and earth. When these two were initially forming, they most likely started out as large flat disks with a relatively slow spin rate. As gravity takes over and particles in the center of that disk start gather into clumps, an accretion disk is formed. As matter is pulled in towards the central object, the spin rate increases due to conservation of angular momentum similar to how you see an ice skater pull their arms in while spinning and they speed up. </p><p>Tidal forces between two objects can also play a significant role on how an objects spins. This too is directly related to the conservation of angular momentum. Without the moon, the Earth would be spinning on it's axis considerably faster. </p><p>As for objects like asteroids, their spin or tumbling is imparted on them through collisions with other objects. Without any significant medium in space to create drag on the object, the spin or tumbling action will continue on until some other force changes it.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div> </div><br /><div><span style="color:#0000ff" class="Apple-style-span">"If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing." - Homer Simpson</span></div> </div>