MeteorWayne":1hil2m2z said:
That was one of my thoughts as well. Still, scary in it's own right. However if that is the case and they ignored FAA rules, they should expect an unpleasant visit from homeland security very shortly....
The FAA is pretty ill-equiped for dealing with the explosion into space. One does their best to adhere to FAR, but a lot of what's going on just isn't covered, and when you try to contact the FAA you get ten different "stories" (opinions) from any single person that will actually talk to you, and just getting a return call is tough. Even their regional PR doesn't seem to want to stick their neck out and return emails and calls.
I just kinda figure enough paper trail combined with adhering to the maximum interpretation of FAR is about the best one can hope for.
Anything anywhere above FL600 reverts to restricted airspace which just complicates things. Up until recently, there wasn't much outside of the military, NASA, and NOAA that was breaking the FL600 mark. Suddenly everyone is pushing that back.
I would generally think it unlike the military to not file a NOTAM. See them all the time around their restricted airspace in the Channel Islands. If you call their PR or Controller it's generally "we're aware of it, thanks, click." At least then you know it's theirs...
That whole airspace from the Channel Islands to LAX is so flippin' busy, I'd never be irresponsible enough to even accidentally let go of a helium party balloon.
And there's a ton of restricted government airspace down there that makes it hard to find a patch of desert even that's safe. We're anal about flying radar reflectors, strobes, and redundant cut-downs and fail-safes for rockets from our secondary launch site out in that desert for that very reason. That and notifying anyone that'll listen.