EarthlingX":2wtuf9bd said:
News-making more likely ...
It was a contrail. Too slow for a missile launch, if nothing else ...
I'm leaning towards contrail as well to be honest. Applying Occam's Razor here would draw that conclusion I think, but the media certainly seem to have got a lot of mileage out of this one because there seem to be a lot of people (including some who call themselves "experts") who insist it was a missile.
And I agree with your comment about "news-making." You're preaching to the converted because I have made similar comments myself recently in some UFO threads about the way the media invent stories sometimes. In fact, here's an an example of the media seemingly still getting as much mileage as possible out of the "missile" ... another one over New York City:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYglwkBhxK0[/youtube]
"Story"
here.
But according to that report:
...CBS 2 reached out to a top astronomer who looked at the video. He said it looks beautiful, but that is was like nothing more than what’s known as a “contrail” — condensation from a commercial or military jet ...
However, since the object is moving much too fast to be an aircraft contrail in my opinion, I wouldn't be at all surprised if the media speeded up the video ... :roll: