I met Lanny Sinkin in San Antonio. At that time, many years ago, he was the head of the antinuke movement.<br /><br />I had moved back to San Antonio and looked up some old buddies in the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. I asked if there were any groups interested in nuclear disarmament. One of the guys I guess heard, "antinuclear" and gave me the 5 W's on the next meeting.<br /><br />I wound up going to three. Lanny was an extremely boring speaker and said a huge number of things about radiation that I knew were not true. When I called him on it, his response was that he was a professor and I was a stupid Vietnam Veteran and to STFU.<br /><br />Finally I asked him what he would use instead of nuclear power. I was hoping he would say SPS or at least ground solar power but his answer floored me.<br /><br />"Lignite".<br /><br />Then he glared at me, sort of daring me to challenge a man of his education and intelligence. That was my last meeting.<br /><br />As one journeys through life, one learns. One learns better if he has heard all sides of an argument. Here are the conclusions I have reached:<br /><br />Lanny Sinkin is nutz. He is arrogant, conceited, and a willful and artless liar. (He's probably also retired and has been replaced by somebody else, this was, I believe, 1977).<br /><br />It's amazing he got to any leadership position. The people around him, both VVAW and antinuclear people, were truly concerned about world peace and really believed that the best way to avoid nuclear war was to cut off the means of production. They were good people with bad leaders.<br /><br />The way to disarmament is - surprise! - disarmament! Disarmament <font color="yellow">really does <font color="white">destroy more weapons than other weapons do. This has been shown dramatically in Iraq, where the paranoid driven invasion has shown, through hostile witnesses no less, that disarmament really does work.<br /><br />I wouldn't worry about the antinuclear protesters from Maine. They ar</font></font>