Hi tyguy,<br /><br />To answer your question regarding clusters, the brightest star in a cluster depends very much on the age of the cluster. <br /><br />In our galaxy, at least, globular clusters are all very old (typically about 10 billion years old) so, as crazyeddie discussed, all the O-A and even often F stars have long since died. The brightest stars in these clusters are the stars that are presently in the last stages of their lives (red giants). The smaller stars are still on the main sequence (M dwarfs, for example, can live more than 100 billion years - so none of them have ever died through ordinary single star evolution).<br /><br />Unlike globular clusters, you can find open clusters over a large range of ages. While they tend to be young (many are only a few million years old, or less than a hundred million years old), there are some that are billions of years old. Because open clusters lose their stars to the general galactic milieu over time (due to tidal forces) they usually disperse in less than a billion years, unless they are particularly rich. The oldest open cluster known is Berkeley 17 (which is more than 10 billion years old), and another really old and interesting one that people study a lot (myself included) is NGC 6791 which is about 9 billion years old. In these old open clusters the brightest star tend to be red giants, just like for the globular clusters. In fact this tends to be true for clusters older than a few hundred million years. In young clusters like the Orion Nebula Cluster, the brightest stars tend to be the really hot, luminous massive O/B/A stars. The most massive stars go through their evolution very rapidly, but they're also very rare. So in a given, rich young cluster the brightest star may be a luminous main sequence star, or the star could be an evolved red supergiant or a wolf rayet (very luminous but bluer than stars on the main sequence) depending on where the cluster's handful of very massive/luminous stars currently <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> </div>