Hi TheChemist<br /><br />"Mudcrascks" is a very inaccurate term. It is far worse than "blueberries" which is obviously coined for the lay audience (It is a bad description too, they are neither blue nor berry sized, peppercorns would be a better description).<br /><br />But mudcracks are a specific geological feature. They form when a layer of mud on the bottom of a pond, lake river or tidal flat dries out and shrinks. These features on Escher and Wopmay features are not mud cracks. They are developed on the rounded surface of a rock and clearly cross cut the bedding. Even if they are formed by clay dehydration, mudcrack is a misleading term for them. There may be mud cracks at Meridiani, but they will be parallel to bedding.<br /><br />The significvance of these feature is that, if they are truly due to deydration, indicate water loss of the rock since it has been a boulder, thus much more recently tha the formation of the evaporites, the concretions, more recently than the formation of Endurance. In fact, because they have developed on the upper surface of the boulders they have formed since Escher and Wopmay rolled into their present position. If these cracks are true dehydration features then it is good evidence that minerals in the Meridiani subsurface are hydrated at depths of only a few metres below the surface, or were so recently on the geomorphic time scale.<br /><br />Cheers<br /><br />Jon<br /><br />. While it is likely they are due to they are <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><em>Whether we become a multi-planet species with unlimited horizons, or are forever confined to Earth will be decided in the twenty-first century amid the vast plains, rugged canyons and lofty mountains of Mars</em> Arthur Clarke</p> </div>