Oumuamua observation

Page 2 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.
Nov 4, 2024
389
29
210
Thank you for all the stuff to ponder about. It makes me wish we could have a breakthrough for farming and global warming water levels by weather control.

im not sure what to think of whistlers I am fascinated with the new term and possible ideas it might spark. Radiation belts I did not know exist. I wonder why the radiation belt exist and not a zone. Due to the emf frequency?
 
Above the thunderstorm is a portion of the ionosphere. When a lightning strike occurs it induces a current in the ionosphere. That current echoes back and forth in the magnetic field as it bounces pole to pole.
In electrical engineering it is well known that the magnitude of an induced current is proportional to the rate of change of the inducing current. This is why using an AC voltage transformer on DC won't work. In the case of lightning, the rate of change is very high, with a rise time of around 10 microseconds. Such a short rise time involving such a large current (100,000 amperes) is sufficient to induce a current 100 miles away.
A volcanic eruption has too long a rise time. Any other terrestrial phenomena than lightning is too slow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CreatedEvolution
Nov 4, 2024
389
29
210
The phenomenon I am pondering is if you move 1 mile is a straight path vs moving in a twister spiral motion

The spiral motion has a longer line so it would have to travel faster to complete the mile at the same time

I can think of practical use. The shuttle could have a rotating cockpit that rotates around the outside of the ship, that adds a spiral motion to lift off. While the rockets speed remains the same the cockpit theoretically slows down due to an elongated path.
 
Nov 4, 2024
389
29
210
When the spinning cockpit around the outside of the craft travels more than a straight line but finishes at the same time you would think it increase force however I theorize it lessening force due to an elongated path.

If the straight line is 1 mile and 1000 pounds of pressure then a path spinning or elongated would have 2 miles to travel while still receiving the 1000 pounds of force

Straight line = 1000pounds of force per mile
Elongated line = 500 pounds of force per mile
 
Nov 4, 2024
389
29
210
I believe what i was trying to say is if you are in a cockpit going straight you go one mile. Now when you are in a 20 ft spiral you increase length reducing actual object speed
 
Nov 4, 2024
389
29
210
I would check for an atmospheric change, to start a whistler. Like air pressure or sound. Thunder. This disturbance would rock and roll, wave, the upper ionosphere. The ionosphere blanket is charged. That charge wave interacts electrically with the magnetosphere. Creating electrical interacting fields at air disturbance frequencies. Oscillating with area dispersion. A density dispersion. A fading.

Do whistlers happen with volcanic eruptions? How about asteroid air explosions.

A hurricane low, might cause a very low freq. whistler. A sub Hz tone. Reflection.

A fleet of sats might paint this space film interaction.

This film, might be another communication channel. OR a new quantum detector.

This film might have a topographical surface map within it, like the surface of an ocean reflecting the bottom structure.

Perhaps a new surface detecting technique. For other places.

Perhaps help with weather prediction here.
I would like a good opinion on whether or not a craft twenty feed wide with the cockpit rotating on the outside would slow down the g force.

my theory is by lengthening the path of the cockpit you reduce g force if a craft travels 5280 miles in 60 seconds that is four gs.

if the actual craft travels one mile but the copit travels a length of two miles the g force would be reduced by half theoretically.
 
Nov 4, 2024
389
29
210
here is what i am struggling with.

the craft travels x mph

the cockpit travels x per 2 miles per hour

lets say this on a smaller scale. when you increase length of a spiral object but its destination is a set speed it would not be 2x per hour because that is increasing speed.

however if an object is traveling 1 mph in a straight path for a destination one mile away the time it take is one hour. now if it is traveling in a spiral motion with a path of 2 miles at 1 mph slowing down the theory

i believe i was mistaken but the answer is probably your speed would be 2 mph
 
Nov 4, 2024
389
29
210
the confusing part would the spiral motion just increase it from 1 to 2 mph

i think yes it would be traveling 1 mile at 2 miles per hour.

theoretically. the craft always traveling on the reverse side of a spin would have less force.

that is why i like posting even the craziest of science ideas like a retrograde motion it sparks meaningless and often failed brain storms
 
Nov 4, 2024
389
29
210
Right now i think it is meaningless but meaningless science a cool equation i calculated was that if a craft has a 20ft circumference rotation is 264 rotations for 1 mile so 4.4 rotations a minute is one mph.

I do not believe a spiral motion will reduce force perhaps tumbling at times though

it the 20 ft craft rotates at 5 rotations per minute then one the craft moving at one mph will probably be traveling at 2 mph.. however weight distribution might be there. a lot of my ideas are impossible but i still try to give them thought for science
 

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts