E
EarthlingX
Guest
I think so.Eman_3":1gt7w94x said:Right now, it's very straightforward. The USA is a signatory to "TREATY ON PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE ACTIVITIES OF STATES IN THE EXPLORATION AND USE OF OUTER SPACE, INCLUDING THE MOON AND OTHER CELESTIAL BODIES (1967)".
In it, can be found
Article I
The exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other
celestial bodies, shall be carried out for the benefit and in the
interests of all countries, irrespective of their degree of economic or
scientific development, and shall be the province of all mankind.
Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, shall be free
for exploration and use by all States without discrimination of any kind,
on a basis of equality and in accordance with international law, and
there shall be free access to all areas of celestial bodies.
There shall be freedom of scientific investigation in outer space,
including the moon and other celestial bodies, and States shall
facilitate and encourage international co-operation in such
investigation.
Article II
Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not
subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of
use or occupation, or by any other means.
So unless the USA wishes to be branded as dishonest and not worth of any trust, breaking this treaty would open up a can of worms. For instance, if the USA decided to break this treaty and allow commercial claims, then, let's pick the Chinese for example, sit back and watch the exploration. Once a profitable method and location is worked out, the Chinese just move in, or at least next door. Dow Chenical spends a trillion dollars exploring for specific materials, and the Chinese spend just a billion to send out a detachment of military and some workers to assemble the production facilities. If the USA decides to use force, then the Chinese nuke Los Angeles, or something similar.
So maybe it's in everyone's best interests to respect the treaty.
It's just that
is not necessarily a problem, but a proposed solution.Outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, is not
subject to national appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of
use or occupation, or by any other means.
It seams to me, that this document kinda establishes appropriation by us Earthlings, we just don't have a proper mechanism in place, because there was no need for such a mechanism, and we had no real capability.
Let's say there was an international, recognized entity, what every you call it, which could give legal rights to commercial or national entities.
No more problem, or better, what else am i missing, apart from the usual political antics ?