instead of being buried in another thread i felt this needed its own. looking for someone to disprove my hypothesis, such that:
1) red shift is comprised of two parts - the gravitational Doppler component that calculates the velocity of a moving star, plus the time-decay component from how long in time the photons have travelled.
2) in early astrophysics it was only the first component that was calculated. only local stars could be studied, therefore the Doppler component vastly overshadowed the decay component. hence why it matched "nearly linearly" with luminosity data.
3) astrophysicists then ignored the second component via ideology that prevents the acceptance of photon decay. therefore, as they viewed more distant stellar bodies they incorrectly assumed that red shift was 100% velocity and 0% time.
4) therefore, the standard model does not "prove" an accelerating expansion via red shift data, but instead uses red shift data to support an hypothesis that the expansion is accelerating. red shift is actually the observable proof that photons decay.
5) in order to close the discrepancy required "novel solutions" such as stretching Nothingness with convoluted math. it also requires the complete ignoring of the Laws of Thermodynamics. how do we justify breaking the laws of physics to explain an hypothesis?
6) the error was then propagated into a discrepancy in the total mass of the universe, as it is limited by an incorrect cosmic geometry that does not account for a deterministic Time vector. the "solution" to this error was dubbed Dark Energy, even though Dark Energy has no solution. they now seek forever in a progress trap to find Dark Energy that doesn't exist because of a misconception over the initial red shift assumption.
7) that if the time-decay component was added back into the squiggly math not only would it allow for the conservation of energy, but the accelerating expansion paradigm would collapse altogether. the CMB would be realized for what it is not, an age of the universe, but for what it is, a visual horizon, thereby allowing the correct age of the universe to be calculated.
8) ancient galaxies and super-massive black holes would no longer be the EXPERIENCED anomalies that they are. the only "crises" they are inducing is within the standard model, and if there was a corrected model they would not induce any crises whatsoever. what is going on is that OBSERVED data that does not fit the ESOTERIC model is being massaged to fit the hypothesis, instead of the ESOTERIC model being changed to fit the OBSERVED data.
9) astrophysicists could then use their time, money, and energy seeking answers to other questions instead of enduring more decades of the Dark Goose Hunt.
1) red shift is comprised of two parts - the gravitational Doppler component that calculates the velocity of a moving star, plus the time-decay component from how long in time the photons have travelled.
2) in early astrophysics it was only the first component that was calculated. only local stars could be studied, therefore the Doppler component vastly overshadowed the decay component. hence why it matched "nearly linearly" with luminosity data.
3) astrophysicists then ignored the second component via ideology that prevents the acceptance of photon decay. therefore, as they viewed more distant stellar bodies they incorrectly assumed that red shift was 100% velocity and 0% time.
4) therefore, the standard model does not "prove" an accelerating expansion via red shift data, but instead uses red shift data to support an hypothesis that the expansion is accelerating. red shift is actually the observable proof that photons decay.
5) in order to close the discrepancy required "novel solutions" such as stretching Nothingness with convoluted math. it also requires the complete ignoring of the Laws of Thermodynamics. how do we justify breaking the laws of physics to explain an hypothesis?
6) the error was then propagated into a discrepancy in the total mass of the universe, as it is limited by an incorrect cosmic geometry that does not account for a deterministic Time vector. the "solution" to this error was dubbed Dark Energy, even though Dark Energy has no solution. they now seek forever in a progress trap to find Dark Energy that doesn't exist because of a misconception over the initial red shift assumption.
7) that if the time-decay component was added back into the squiggly math not only would it allow for the conservation of energy, but the accelerating expansion paradigm would collapse altogether. the CMB would be realized for what it is not, an age of the universe, but for what it is, a visual horizon, thereby allowing the correct age of the universe to be calculated.
8) ancient galaxies and super-massive black holes would no longer be the EXPERIENCED anomalies that they are. the only "crises" they are inducing is within the standard model, and if there was a corrected model they would not induce any crises whatsoever. what is going on is that OBSERVED data that does not fit the ESOTERIC model is being massaged to fit the hypothesis, instead of the ESOTERIC model being changed to fit the OBSERVED data.
9) astrophysicists could then use their time, money, and energy seeking answers to other questions instead of enduring more decades of the Dark Goose Hunt.
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram