J
j05h
Guest
The first human Mars flights should establish an orbiting outpost instead of landing. This is a project (unlike Mars or Moon landings) that can be built right now. Instead of worrying about site selection on Mars, bring dozens of rovers and balloon-kites and explore the whole planet from above. Seek ground truth and mining opportunities further along.<br /><br />We covered this extensively as a Phobos operation in my "Private Mars Missions" thread, and I'd like to expand it. We've been discussing the Mars Direct ERV and favorite Mars architectures lately. Well, what is the value of landing at a single site on Mars (and developing a range of new tech) raised against establishing an ISS-scale station in Mars orbit? This Mars outposts could control dozens of robots across Mars and the moons while operating in a known environment. Thoughts?<br /><br />Everybody favors landing on Mars for the adventure, but is the real value in staying in orbit there? Is "Phobos First" the answer to early and sustainable Mars exploration? It seems like an easier first step that can further lead to landings and settlements. <br /><br />Here's the old thread as well, it's pretty interesting:<br /><br />http://uplink.space.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=businesstech&Number=503952&page=&view=&sb=&o=&vc=1 <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div align="center"><em>We need a first generation of pioneers.</em><br /></div> </div>