Jmeyer - To explain how and why I reject the balloon model:<br /><br />I prefer a flat model based on Biblical astronomy, the stretching fine gauze of Isaiah 40:22, the stretching threads and filaments of our universe which is observed today.<br /><br />I.e. scientific observation vs. scientific speculation.<br /><br />There is one thing observed which would be true either of the balloon model, or the Biblical model, or, for that matter, other current models:<br /><br />Every distant point on the expanding fabric of space is expanding away from every other point. And more distant points are expanding faster.<br /><br />That is what is observed.<br /><br />If you examine the Biblical model more closely: <br /><br />A stretching fabric like a stretching fine gauze with its threads and filaments would have some bonds loosen or even break, causing a localized recoil.<br /><br />This may be happening now in the gravitational tug of war between the Great Attractor and another attractor in Perseus. It appears that the bonds to Perseus are broken but we are bound to Great Attractor.<br /><br />The Biblical model does indicate such bonds can either hold fast or be loosened:<br /><br />(Job 38:31-33) ?31 Can you tie fast the bonds of the Ki´mah constellation, Or can you loosen the very cords of the Ke´sil constellation? 32 Can you bring forth the Maz´za·roth constellation in its appointed time? And as for the Ash constellation alongside its sons, can you conduct them? 33 Have you come to know the statutes of the heavens, Or could you put its authority in the earth??<br /><br />That such bonds can be loosened is also observed scientifically, e.g.: the question whether certain stars are gravitationally bound or not.<br /><br />It is important to note that in various flat models like my favorite as I described briefly and also in the balloon model, flat or curved is not actually in 3-d.<br /><br />The surface of the balloon is already 3-d, what is inside would be beyond 3-d and is only conceptual, not