Shrinking Mercury

Page 2 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MeteorWayne

Guest
<p><BR/>Replying to:<BR/><DIV CLASS='Discussion_PostQuote'>LOL wayne!!&nbsp; You don't like my M.J. pic?...No? <br />Posted by majornature</DIV></p><p>The pictures fine, It's too damn big and takes up too much space. Many here find it rather annoying.</p><p>Now if you don't mind being annoying, go right ahead....<br /></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>
 
D

derekmcd

Guest
Apparently she doesn't mind.&nbsp; As if navigating the fora aren't difficult enough already, the extra space just adds to it. <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <div> </div><br /><div><span style="color:#0000ff" class="Apple-style-span">"If something's hard to do, then it's not worth doing." - Homer Simpson</span></div> </div>
 
M

MeteorWayne

Guest
<p>http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/080325-st-mercury-cliffs.html</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>"</p><p>Mercury's surface is not only peppered with impact craters, but also wrinkled with mysterious chains of cliffs.</p><p>Scientists think the "lobate scarp" cliffs &mdash; some 2 miles (3.2 kilometers) high and hundreds of miles long &mdash; were created as Mercury's crust bunched up around its shrinking interior, something like a dried-out piece of fruit. A new theory, however, suggests that rising sheets of hot mantle rock popped out the planet's characteristic ridges, helping to create the cliffs.</p><p>"There's a preferred north-south alignment to these scarps," Scott King, a planetary geophysicist at Virginia Tech University, told <em>SPACE.com</em>. "If you just have a shrinking sphere, there's no reason they should be aligned. It should be fairly random."</p><p>Instead of just a shrinking crust, King thinks linear sheets of rock heaved on the planet's crust from below, pushing up the cliff-like features. He detailed his computer-modeled hypothesis in the March 16 online edition of the journal <em>Nature Geoscience</em>."</p><p>Assuming the scarps are indeed lined up, King thinks a thin yet active mantle layer beneath Mercury's crust may be to blame for the cliff-like features.</p><p>"It has a very large iron core compared to Earth, Venus and Mars," King said of Mercury's metallic heart. "The rock above it is confined to a real thin shell."</p><p>Because there's hardly any room for hot mantle rock to snake toward the planet's surface, King's models suggest that the material is forced into a rolling pattern of linear or sheet-like plumes. On Earth &mdash; where mantle space abounds beneath the crust &mdash; rising rock is mostly squeezed into cylindrical plumes.</p><p>"The dynamics are much different for Mercury. I've done a number of models, and this roll pattern almost always shows up," King said. "The stresses created by that on the crust can be enormous."</p><p><strong>Still active?</strong></p><p>Although both King and Solomon agree that Mercury's cliffs probably stopped forming a few billion years ago, King's models suggest that convection activity might still be roiling beneath the planet's surface.</p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080"><em><font color="#000000">But the Krell forgot one thing John. Monsters. Monsters from the Id.</font></em> </font></p><p><font color="#000080">I really, really, really, really miss the "first unread post" function</font><font color="#000080"> </font></p> </div>
 
3

3488

Guest
<p>
<br /><font color="#ff0000">Posted by MeteorWayne</font>
</p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>Thank you very much MeteorWayne. Your post has helped validate something I had been seeking & starting to find some evidence of.<br /></strong></font></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>Your post explains in a clear way what has been tipping me off.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>A while back, there was speculation that Mercury's core was contaminated by Sulphur, thus lowering the melting point of the iron. Whether or not this is true ais a little immaterial, the fact remains that Mercury's core is still active, according to evidence.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>One feature imaged by Mariner 10, to me is a smoking gun.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>Tir Planitia. Area imaged below is 130 KM across.</strong></font><br /><img src="http://sitelife.space.com/ver1.0/Content/images/store/3/2/c39d8702-52d7-4830-b281-53f5b6e015be.Medium.jpg" alt="" /></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>What is immediately obvious, is the dark stain & the small rupes. The dark stain looks less heavily cratered than the surrounding terrain. Also if it is volcanic ash, then over time micrometeoroids will have gardened it into the regolith. Clearly this has not happened here, the dark staining is clearly visible on the surface.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>I reckon geologically speaking, the area pictured above was active till 'fairly recently'.</strong></font></p><p><font size="2" color="#003300"><strong>Andrew Brown.<br /></strong></font></p> <div class="Discussion_UserSignature"> <p><font color="#000080">"I suddenly noticed an anomaly to the left of Io, just off the rim of that world. It was extremely large with respect to the overall size of Io and crescent shaped. It seemed unbelievable that something that big had not been visible before".</font> <em><strong><font color="#000000">Linda Morabito </font></strong><font color="#800000">on discovering that the Jupiter moon Io was volcanically active. Friday 9th March 1979.</font></em></p><p><font size="1" color="#000080">http://www.launchphotography.com/</font><br /><br /><font size="1" color="#000080">http://anthmartian.googlepages.com/thisislandearth</font></p><p><font size="1" color="#000080">http://web.me.com/meridianijournal</font></p> </div>
 
N

neilsox

Guest
<p>It seems reasonable that all the planets are shrinking perhaps one part per billion per century, but we have no proof and little evidence, so they could be growing about that fast due to meteors, dust and micro comets.</p><p>It is also reasonable to assume the cores are cooling , but we have no proof and little evidence.&nbsp;Rapid shrinking seems very improbable.&nbsp; Neil<br /></p>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.