So where is this Space Elevator already???

Page 3 - Seeking answers about space? Join the Space community: the premier source of space exploration, innovation, and astronomy news, chronicling (and celebrating) humanity's ongoing expansion across the final frontier.
Status
Not open for further replies.
V

Valcan

Guest
halman":12chcchd said:
After skimming over this thread, I did not see any mention of Arthur C. Clarke's "The Fountains Of Paradise", which provides an excellent treatment of the construction of a space elevator. Since few people here are likely to read it, I will try to provide a synopsis.

Development of an ultra-strong synthetic material (Clarke used diamond monofilament) is made possible by zero-gravity manufacturing. Starting from geosynchronous orbit (which I call the Clarke orbit, because it is easier to spell,) two tapes, or cables, are constructed, one going up, the other going down. The mass of the structure must be kept in equilibrium to prevent it from wandering off station. A counterweight of several million tons is attached to the upper end as the lower end is anchored on Earth. The structure is a square tube, with tracks running up each side. Payloads are not lifted, they propel themselves up the tower, or are allowed to descend with braking forces. (Regenerative braking is used to capture energy.) Payload costs are equivalent to running an electrical motor of a few horsepower for about 30 hours, because the vehicle is not having to hold itself up against gravity, nor does it have to deal with atmospheric resistance. Payloads for other planets can be launched by the tower acting as a sling.

Breakage of the tower does not result in the whole thing falling down, because the upper portion is kept in orbit by its velocity. Only the lower few miles of the tower is subject to atmospheric disturbances, which would be the most likely cause of a failure. The tower would be a flexible structure, which would result in bowing, or distortion, as payloads ascend and descend. The capability of launching payloads by sling is limited because of the energy transfers involved, which cannot exceed certain values.

Clarke took a huge leap of speculation in '3001', supposing that it would be possible to connect towers together at the Clarke orbit altitude, eventually forming a ring around the planet. The towers are still supported by the orbital structure, and are not held up from below.

Manufacture of the material used to support the structure is almost certainly going to have to happen in space, because thousands of miles of CONTINUOUS cable is required, and the cable must have a tensile strength of thousands of tons per inch. The amount of carbon required, as well as the energy needed to process it, makes it unlikely to happen on Earth, even if the problems of gravity effects on the manufacture of the cable could be overcome.

Once constructed, no other method of reaching space could be as cheap as the tower, because any vehicle must hold itself up against gravity while traversing the portion of the atmosphere which is too dense to pass through at high velocity. A vehicle climbing the tower only needs enough energy to climb against gravity, not to hold itself up as well as climb.

Don't expect to see a space elevator in construction until we have cheap and easy access to space. But the amount of commerce which will happen between Earth and space will eventually not only justify constructing an elevator, but necessitate it. Where one or two people used to walk or ride horseback, now thousands travel at a time. The same will be true with space. Where one or two traveled by rocket, someday thousands will ride by elevator.

More and more it seems that the problem isnt always technology so much as industry the technology to develope and colonise space is there its just the industry to get there isnt going anywhere fast.
 
E

EarthlingX

Guest
If you start from the top, and then go down, there's a lot of places where you can get rather fast. No sci-fi cables, just go to the store ..
We don't need much new tech to move asteroids, we just need to know where they are, and that is something that is going on, with at least 2 pics, here, on the forum. It just takes a while to get them closer, enough time to learn some new tricks ..
Like getting to the LEO, breathing space, propulsion which has max Isp, not thrust, making something out of those free rocks worth big $ numbers if you get them to the LEO, or making something out of them on the way ...
 
V

Valcan

Guest
EarthlingX":1cuvpa9l said:
If you start from the top, and then go down, there's a lot of places where you can get rather fast. No sci-fi cables, just go to the store ..
We don't need much new tech to move asteroids, we just need to know where they are, and that is something that is going on, with at least 2 pics, here, on the forum. It just takes a while to get them closer, enough time to learn some new tricks ..
Like getting to the LEO, breathing space, propulsion which has max Isp, not thrust, making something out of those free rocks worth big $ numbers if you get them to the LEO, or making something out of them on the way ...

Yea have to agree. I want to be a asteroid miner :geek:

I've seen alot of articles on how to do it and it certainly seems possible to do it both cheaply and easily. Mining companies have wanted to get at the minerals in asteroids for awhile just never have had the chance to get there.

Currently most rare earth metals are mined by china. The only site in the US that compared was closed yrs ago. (Yeay for stupid crap now instead of oil our kids get to deal with being dependent on rare earth metals.)
Mining and fitting out asteroids is in my mind a far more worth while goal than a space elevator. Imagine being able to construct the stuff you need in orbit instead of on the ground. Heck we are already getting working fabricators online.
 
H

halman

Guest
Valcan":fw41ivpz said:
EarthlingX":fw41ivpz said:
If you start from the top, and then go down, there's a lot of places where you can get rather fast. No sci-fi cables, just go to the store ..
We don't need much new tech to move asteroids, we just need to know where they are, and that is something that is going on, with at least 2 pics, here, on the forum. It just takes a while to get them closer, enough time to learn some new tricks ..
Like getting to the LEO, breathing space, propulsion which has max Isp, not thrust, making something out of those free rocks worth big $ numbers if you get them to the LEO, or making something out of them on the way ...

Yea have to agree. I want to be a asteroid miner :geek:

I've seen alot of articles on how to do it and it certainly seems possible to do it both cheaply and easily. Mining companies have wanted to get at the minerals in asteroids for awhile just never have had the chance to get there.

Currently most rare earth metals are mined by china. The only site in the US that compared was closed yrs ago. (Yeay for stupid crap now instead of oil our kids get to deal with being dependent on rare earth metals.)
Mining and fitting out asteroids is in my mind a far more worth while goal than a space elevator. Imagine being able to construct the stuff you need in orbit instead of on the ground. Heck we are already getting working fabricators online.

You hit the nail on the head regarding having a chance to get there. Access to space is the only thing holding back enormous investment in space technology. We won't see a space elevator until after that investment has started paying off.

See the thread "Cheap and Easy Access To Space" to look at a way to make access possible soon.
 
E

EarthlingX

Guest
http://www.universetoday.com : Developers Say Lunar Elevator Could be Built Within a Decade
July 19th, 2010

Written by Nancy Atkinson


Concept for a lunar elevator. Credit: Liftport, courtesy Michael Laine

The idea of a space elevator has been around since the late 1800's, but despite big dreams and years of research, the low-cost, easy access to orbit that a space elevator promises is likely still decades away. The biggest problem rests on the fact that no one has been able to successfully manufacture long ribbons made of ultra-light, ultra-strong carbon nanotubes, the only known material that is strong enough for a space elevator. But entrepreneur Michael Laine believes a lunar elevator – a space elevator from the surface of the Moon – could be created with materials that are available now. With more research and the right amount of capital, Laine says a lunar elevator could be built within a decade.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts